Pools that should be tags

pool #737 - Colored Pubic Hair -> colored_pubic_hair

Consistent with the companion mismatched_pubic_hair, and the tag is already somewhat populated. The pool does contain a clause that the pubic hair must be noticeable, but it's approaching 1000 images now, and I don't think the "noticeable" distinction is important or objective enough to warrant regular maintenance.

feline_lump said:

pool #737 - Colored Pubic Hair -> colored_pubic_hair

+1 to this. There are also some tags for different colors of pubic hair (blonde pubic hair, green pubic hair, etc.) that ought to be tagged and possibly implicated

I agree with this.
Pools should either be a reward (like Perfect hands), a thing tha describes thing in a series (For example "God damn it Yukari") or a series with multiple pictures to it, like comics or this Mtu upskirt-series.
Pubic hair doesn't fit in any of them.

While I was tagging colors for pool #737, I noticed that colored_pubic_hair is basically just a search for -black_pubic_hair (if such a tag existed) or -black_pubic_hair -brown_pubic_hair. Should we create and populate these tags instead of (or in addition to) colored_pubic_hair?

EDIT: If there's going to be a black pubic hair, I would like a colored pubic hair at least temporarily, so I can search pubic_hair -black_pubic_hair -colored_pubic_hair instead of trying to negate each individual color (which times out)

I'd just stick with colored_pubic_hair, as it's a direct 1:1 pool transfer and it's only one tag versus two for black and brown.

Hillside_Moose said:

I'd just stick with colored_pubic_hair, as it's a direct 1:1 pool transfer and it's only one tag versus two for black and brown.

+1 for this.

Hillside_Moose said:

I'd just stick with colored_pubic_hair, as it's a direct 1:1 pool transfer and it's only one tag versus two for black and brown.

Agreed with this. Also colored pubic hair should be the minority, and tagging the minority is a lot easier than tagging the majority. You also will generally have better results being able to do a search using a tag saying its present (positive search) than searching by excluding the alternatives (negative searches).

So no to black_pubic_hair and brown_pubic_hair. Are the other individual color tags ok, or should they be lumped together into colored_pubic_hair?

Converting pool #737 into a tag is not a bad idea, as other have already said, but rather than mass edit it should be done manually to ensure that posts fit our definition. Colored Pubic Hair pool used to also include blonde pubic hair, so some posts with it are still there even though current definition does not include them.

fossilnix said:

So no to black_pubic_hair and brown_pubic_hair. Are the other individual color tags ok, or should they be lumped together into colored_pubic_hair?

No, we should not tag any of the individual colors. First, it is not necessary since searches like green_hair colored_pubic_hair will do the trick. Second, see old discussion in topic #8145.

mass update blue_pubic_hair -> colored_pubic_hair
mass update purple_pubic_hair -> colored_pubic_hair
mass update green_pubic_hair -> colored_pubic_hair
mass update aqua_pubic_hair -> colored_pubic_hair
mass update pink_pubic_hair -> colored_pubic_hair

Link to request

A mass edit can cover the pool, because I tagged it with colors yesterday.

Do blonde, red, orange, white, or silver count as colored_pubic_hair, or should they just be mass removed?

The bulk update request #753 has been approved.