Posted under Tags
BrokenEagle98 said:
Yeesh, you're right. Hadn't considered that. Working it now. Luckily, there's only 16 pages to go through.
Probably need to go through stuffed_animal as well.
Edit:
Actually, I'll wait to see if what others think, whether stuffed animal pokemon count or not...
I think that stuffed_animal versions should be left alone, as otherwise we'll have to tag any character doll with an implication for their copyright. That... would be painful.
Finished with both personification and humanization. I'll also check the posts from the last few days since the update.
Can anyone validate this old BUR for missing entries...
I just ran my own mass updater, making sure to subtract cosplay and pokemon_(creature)...
Example:
update bulbasaur -personification -cosplay -humanization -pokemon_(creature) -> bulbasaur pokemon_(creature)
...and it tagged ~300 posts.
Also summoning the original creator of this topic/BUR.
If I get an updated version of the BUR, I can run it again to hopefully catch any misses.
Note that this does not include any Pokemon from Pokemon S&M.
I can try and compile a list of them if you want though.
Yes, if it's not too much trouble... :)
Also, this brings up an interesting point. This particular case highlights something not covered by implications, yet if it's not continually kept on, will slide into not being fully tagged like this one was. (~300 misses after ~8 months).
Therefore, instead of having to continually do or submit BURs for the same situation, it would be beneficial instead if there was a recurrence option that could be set for pure update requests (i.e. no imply/alias etc). These recurrence BURs would get run every month and could also be updated if required, e.g. where a new batch of Pokemon get released.
Thoughts?
Updated.
I've grabbed a list of all so far known S&M Pokemon from Bulbapedia and I've added them to the BUR.
I've also updated the list_of_pokemon wiki page with them, though this will ofcourse need further updating as more Pokemon are revealed.
Updated
@BrokenEagle98 @GabrielWB is that huge mass update request (957) safe to approve now? I'd like to get it out of the way, since it takes up about 85% of space in admin dashboard.
The bulk update request #957 has been approved.
The bulk update request #957 has been approved.
The bulk update request #957 has been approved.
Type-kun said:
Why would it? most of the posts were manually retagged already. At least now admin dashboard can be navigated more freely, it actually started to lag due to size of this particular request :3
Ok.
I only feared it would be a Downbooru, because the first BUR caused it. But that's good.
