Tbf, if you're going to cry about it, the least you could do is avoid getting into positions where multiple women vying for your attention are (if we're being generous) hugging your naked body.
I'm surprised Sensei hasn't collapsed into a black hole, he's so dense....
The way jazz's Blue Archive posts are going (and assuming they're all in the same continuity), it's going to end with someone resting in pieces, and I'm still not sure who. (Likely not Sensei, unless someone figures out how to get pieces from something that dense....)
If heaven is a place I can't go based on how much I donate pray at the church or how broken my moral compass needs to be so a book who knows where it came from has to dictate how I live, I prefer to stay in Limbo. Thank you.
nah dude there are tons of sources of its authenticity from random nobodies from 2 thousand years ago who had all the free time in the world and massive political power/control over what little media was available at the time, followed for years after by people who had nothing else to turn to. trust me bro this is the real deal
Remember, Big J has absolutely no qualms against beating the shit out of people who disrespects his dad's house.
I feel like that particular section in the Bible is similar to the east-Asian idiom “Even the Buddha will get mad, if you slap him three times in the face.” I.e. even the patience of a saint can be understandably lost in the right circumstance.
I feel like F-35 should be curvier than her sister given that she's the stealthier one. Come to think of it, would aircraft women follow Kancolle rules where their curves are based on displacement and amount of armaments, or would it be more based on how soft or angular the physical design of the original aircraft was?
I feel like F-35 should be curvier than her sister given that she's the stealthier one. Come to think of it, would aircraft women follow Kancolle rules where their curves are based on displacement and amount of armaments, or would it be more based on how soft or angular the physical design of the original aircraft was?
@natsume-shokogami: Except, the current Pope is the most gay-friendly pope there ever was.
Pretty sure he will openly condemn what is depicted in this picture.
Well, the rest of the church still not accept them, also he had an instant speaking slurs (even it may not be intentional, it's still a thing considerable)
If it's not an approver post this, this image would very likely be rejected for both having poor quality and potentially violating the site's rules, don't know why they posted this. Edit: Ok, the commnity rules may not cover this and most about community post/comments; this one can be still considered low-effort tho
If it's not an approver post this, this image would very likely be rejected for both having poor quality and potentially violating the site's rules, don't know why they posted this. Edit: Ok, the commnity rules may not cover this and most about community post/comments; this one can be still considered low-effort tho
While it has been uploaded by an Approver who is able to bypass the approval process, the image was sent through the queue and is currently sitting in it. The blue border around the thumbnail, the Status: Pending to the left, and the banner at the top of the page are signs of that.
I'm not putting the link to the original post where the post was since the original post was deleted by the user both on his Deviantart account and on Tumbler and it's not on his Twitter account or at least I didn't find it there.
I'm not putting the link to the original post where the post was since the original post was deleted by the user both on his Deviantart account and on Tumbler and it's not on his Twitter account or at least I didn't find it there.
That's not how we handle sources. If you legitimately don't know where exactly this came from and can't find it, then that's fine. But if you do know, then you should include it, even if the link is dead.
That's not how we handle sources. If you legitimately don't know where exactly this came from and can't find it, then that's fine. But if you do know, then you should include it, even if the link is dead.
it's that I'm not joking I don't know what was on daviart or tumbler since they are the social networks where this type of things are published the most and as I mentioned I also looked on his twitter account and I didn't find it there either and I tried hard to find the original source and I didn't find it so I don't understand what you want me to do yes I already explained that I couldn't find anything and it wasn't because I was lazy but because you should I didn't find the original source where this fanart was I found this fanart on zeochan and there the name of the original artist was written and I searched on both social networks both in his tumbler account which no longer exists and in his deviantart account which is not there either and as I told you I also searched on his twitter account but I didn't find it there either I only saw it on another user's account but it is not the account of the original user of this fanart so I didn't put that source so as not to make a mistake and get into trouble
I told you I also searched on his twitter account but I didn't find it there either I only saw it on another user's account but it is not the account of the original user of this fanart so I didn't put that source so as not to make a mistake and get into trouble
In cases like this, the URL you got the image from should be put in the source field and the image should be tagged with third-party source. It's acceptable to upload from a third-party source if you can't find the original source. It's better than nothing.
Also, please use punctuation in your comments. Your run-on sentences are hard to read.
