Donmai

Comments

Blacklisted:
Show 7 more comments
[hidden]

effr said:

The "powerful Ukraine" is always successful on the Internet, but in reality it is the opposite.

That statement says more about the Russian incompetence than anything, considering that two years later they still aren't even close to winning the war.

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Incineration said:

    That statement says more about the Russian incompetence than anything, considering that two years later they still aren't even close to winning the war.

    But the strong American army still lost to the Chinese in North Korea and then to the Vietnamese in Vietnam Does this also indicate the incompetence of the Americans?

  • -2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Ukraine was building up their army since 2014. They may not have been Russia powerful, but they weren't a weak army. And while Russia botched their initial offensive, they're proving good at holding the territory they took from Ukraine.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Kaktus_Lata said:

    Ukraine was building up their army since 2014. They may not have been Russia powerful, but they weren't a weak army. And while Russia botched their initial offensive, they're proving good at holding the territory they took from Ukraine.

    Minefields that are miles thick tend to be effective, but also shows how little they care about what they're conquering outside of simple increasing the size on a map. It's highly doubtful they'll spend time and money clearing them, as such the poor people who live in those areas will now have unknown decades of deaths caused by those mines.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Kaktus_Lata said:

    Ukraine was building up their army since 2014. They may not have been Russia powerful, but they weren't a weak army. And while Russia botched their initial offensive, they're proving good at holding the territory they took from Ukraine.

    The equipment of the Ukrainian military in 2014 remained almost at the level of the Soviet military in the 1980s, and their poor politics led to a large portion of the troops in Crimea surrendering to Russia

  • -2
  • Reply
  • Show 3 more comments
    [hidden]

    Kessen said:

    German tanks with crosses rusting in Kursk region...wait that has happened before!

    Can't blame them. Those NK soldiers with high end STEALTH technology, that makes them invisible, and Predator like devices to self destruct. That's more than the stuff the 3rd Reich had to deal with.

  • -4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    The hornet_(kancolle) tag doesn't apply to the images in this series with the white-shirted girl as that's CV-12, not CV-8. The vehicle and personification tag does, however, thanks to the sneaky addition of CV-12 in the right hand corner there. All in all, an awesome series of images by Timmyyen! It really reminds me of that image of Azur Lane's Illustrious with all the planes she carried in her lifetime.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    That's not a F-86, it's a FJ Fury. Can't really tell from the side view whether it's meant to be a -2, -3, or -4 model though, since the main difference is the wing design. Not sure how to tag it, since the original FJ-1 was very different and this isn't that. If the tags even need to be that specific, anyway.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    6point72 said:

    That's not a F-86, it's a FJ Fury. Can't really tell from the side view whether it's meant to be a -2, -3, or -4 model though, since the main difference is the wing design. Not sure how to tag it, since the original FJ-1 was very different and this isn't that. If the tags even need to be that specific, anyway.

    Because the FJ Fury is a navalized F-86, for tagging purposes here on Danbooru it keeps the f-86 tag, similar to how the Sea Hurricane is tagged Hawker Hurricane. I know on navalized aircraft with several examples get their own tag implied to the base plane, like the Seafire implies to Spitfire, but as these are the first examples of the Fury we're a ways off that.

    When it does reach that point, it would just be tagged "FJ Fury", with all the variants under the one tag.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Historyanon said:

    Because the FJ Fury is a navalized F-86

    It's more complicated than that. The Fury came first, in its original straight winged FJ-1 configuration. That design was later developed into the F-86. The Sabre was then adapted back into a naval fighter as the FJ-2 and -3 models. Then the final FJ-4 variant was a new development from the -3 and not based on any Sabre model.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Historyanon said:

    The hornet_(kancolle) tag doesn't apply to the images in this series with the white-shirted girl as that's CV-12, not CV-8. The vehicle and personification tag does, however, thanks to the sneaky addition of CV-12 in the right hand corner there. All in all, an awesome series of images by Timmyyen! It really reminds me of that image of Azur Lane's Illustrious with all the planes she carried in her lifetime.

    You probably meant Victorious

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    sugusaraha said:

    But the flower dies when you pick it, does this means a death flag?

    "Time waits for no one, nor does it know mercy, yet the more I look at you, the more I look forward for the future."

    - Some guy who might've died at some point, probably.

  • 4
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6