Posted under General
Toks said:
The <center> and <p align="center"> tags are working again. We also got
, <s>, and <u>. [/quote] Just found that out myself. Also, the crowded leading/line spacing appears to have been fixed for larger font sizes (e.g., post #1372048), but it still looks too big at smaller font sizes (e.g., post #1371916). That's a minor issue overall, though.
Moonspeaker said:
Just found that out myself. Also, the crowded leading/line spacing appears to have been fixed for larger font sizes (e.g., post #1372048), but it still looks too big at smaller font sizes (e.g., post #1371916). That's a minor issue overall, though.
If you mean "Why the proud face there?" note in post #1371916, it already has normal line-height css attribute by now. E.g. that's how browser thinks that font size should be spaced vertically, there's really nothing else to do about it.
MyrMindservant said:
I've created a Github issue about moving blacklisted tags section above the tags listing, like it was in old version of the site, [...]What others are thinking about this?
I could live with having the blacklisted tags at the bottom, but I prefer having them at the top.
(TBH, I’d prefer the unhiding of posts with multiple blacklist rules getting fixed first, though.)
What's the deal with the alias function right now?
1-2 days ago, I could create an alias at http://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_aliases/new
Now, it lets me enter the info, but then takes me to a log-in page and then nothing seems to come out.
Kikimaru said:
1-2 days ago, I could create an alias at http://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_aliases/new
i didn't see in the forum that you submitted one lately. the last one appears to be made last february ( forum #85090 ).
the login page might be the result of access denied.
https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru/issues/802
danbooru says:
- before_filter :admin_only, :only => [:approve, :destroy]- before_filter :member_only, :only => [:create]
+ before_filter :admin_only, :only => [:approve, :destroy, :create]
i assume only admins can use that form by now.
EDIT: oops, sorry. didn't know we're reading at the same time.
Updated
The create alias in Danbooru 2 not like the alias creator from Danbooru 1. It's tool for jxh or albert to use to create aliases based on forum discussion.
See https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru/issues/802
EDIT: Sniped by ghostrigger
Kikimaru said:
1-2 days ago, I could create an alias at http://danbooru.donmai.us/tag_aliases/new
What alias did you try to make with that page 1-2 days ago? Because of the bug that allowed anyone to use it, it probably went through automatically.
I'm curious if Albert deleted the aliases made by people other than admins when he fixed the bug, or if they still need to be cleaned up.
Also, new issue to get the old alias/implication proposal pages added back: issue #824.
Updated
Haven't a clue what alias I made, sorry.
Toks said:
What alias did you try to make with that page 1-2 days ago? Because of the bug that allowed anyone to use it, it probably went through automatically.
I'm curious if Albert deleted the aliases made by people other than admins when he fixed the bug, or if they still need to be cleaned up.
Also, new issue to get the old alias/implication proposal pages added back: issue #824.
Just spotted that time of uploading has changed its format, which says absolute nothing to me ( and probably the other people living in other time zones where the server is keept)> Can we come back to the old system uploaded 1 min, 1 hour , 1 day ago ? I see no benefits of using the current format whereas we could obtain such info as we have now, clicking 1 min , 1 hour etc. link in the old system.
HNTI said:
Just spotted that time of uploading has changed its format, which says absolute nothing to me ( and probably the other people living in other time zones where the server is keept)> Can we come back to the old system uploaded 1 min, 1 hour , 1 day ago ? I see no benefits of using the current format whereas we could obtain such info as we have now, clicking 1 min , 1 hour etc. link in the old system.
Not everyone hates timestamps, so an option is better than changing it back.
HNTI said:
Just spotted that time of uploading has changed its format, which says absolute nothing to me ( and probably the other people living in other time zones where the server is keept)> Can we come back to the old system uploaded 1 min, 1 hour , 1 day ago ? I see no benefits of using the current format whereas we could obtain such info as we have now, clicking 1 min , 1 hour etc. link in the old system.
I like the additional granularity timestamps provide. But looks like Albert's reverting to the old style.
Updated
RaisingK said:
I like the additional granularity timestamps provide. But looks like Albert's reverting to the old style.
The additional granularity was already available before in the date’s tooltip and I assume that that will still be available after the revert. Requires shoving the mouse around, though.
posts time like old danbooru is better for me (1hour ago, 1day ago, etc...), but albert, can you restore the clickable link to posts date like old danbooru? (Date: 1 day ago ) just for convenience.
and 1 more thing, if you for some reason can't add who favored some post with his name, at least you can add the number of users? like "Favorited by: 10 users". i found so convenient the old fav counter.
thanks
Graysnake2834 said:
and 1 more thing, if you for some reason can't add who favored some post with his name, at least you can add the number of users? like "Favorited by: 10 users". i found so convenient the old fav counter.
I'm still waiting for resolving this https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru/issues/449
When it's done, counting number of users who favorite a post shouldn't be too complicated to implement in userscript (another good reason to restore previous favorites' functionality)
richie said:
I'm still waiting for resolving this https://github.com/r888888888/danbooru/issues/449
When it's done, counting number of users who favorite a post shouldn't be too complicated to implement in userscript (another good reason to restore previous favorites' functionality)
There's no need to wait for that to be resolved to write a userscript that counts the number of favorites.
Each post page already has a <meta name="favorites"> that lists each user's ID. That can be used to easily calculate the number of favorites for a post without calling the API.
It would also be fairly easy to use the same <meta name="favorites"> to list each user's name. The only problem is that I believe you must make a separate API call for each user's ID.
Log said:
Private message counter isn't working properly, I've constantly got a reading of 15-16 but only 1 unread message.
I haven't checked it yet to be fully sure, but perhaps it is also including unread messages in your sent messages section as well. When I receive a message I too have it appear with like a 16, and as it turns out after looking I have 15 messages under sent message that are highlighted as unread.
whoa, I think I just came across a critical bug. post #1040164. ootori_kakeru was a general tag, and I wanted to change it to a character tag (even though regular users can't do this anymore?). I didn't want it to appear that I made no changes, so I also added the chain-link_fence tag. I hit submit, but wasn't logged in. For some reason, I just clicked back on the browser and hit submit again. The change went through, but it shows that somebody else (someone with a janitor account) edited the post.
edit: I tried it again on another post but was unable to duplicate it.
souryuu9 said:
whoa, I think I just came across a critical bug. post #1040164. ootori_kakeru was a general tag, and I wanted to change it to a character tag (even though regular users can't do this anymore?). I didn't want it to appear that I made no changes, so I also added the chain-link_fence tag. I hit submit, but wasn't logged in. For some reason, I just clicked back on the browser and hit submit again. The change went through, but it shows that somebody else (someone with a janitor account) edited the post.
I've also experienced this once recently, but on the other end. I updated a tag's type without changing any tags, and it said I added a tag I didn't. I assume someone else added that tag.
New issue: #847
If it happens again to anyone, be sure mention it and provide any information you have.
souryuu9 said:
(even though regular users can't do this anymore?)
Huh? Why wouldn't they be able to?
