Is this loli? The character seems to be canonically quite young, plus the voice effects have an extremely loli "sound".
If it's loli, I wonder if other children of the parent post should be tagged too, since they're all the same base.
Posted under General
Is this loli? The character seems to be canonically quite young, plus the voice effects have an extremely loli "sound".
If it's loli, I wonder if other children of the parent post should be tagged too, since they're all the same base.
PolishedRubbish said:
Is this loli? The character seems to be canonically quite young, plus the voice effects have an extremely loli "sound".
If it's loli, I wonder if other children of the parent post should be tagged too, since they're all the same base.
Canon age and voice aren't relevant to tagging loli. I'm personally leaning petite on those.
Should this be tagged onee-shota? Nothing else with the male character is tagged as shota
post #1323096 and children
Need a loli check on these. They're not tagged consistently, though they vary in suggestiveness. Out of all of them, post #1066975 seems to be the most innocent and might not need the tag.
KirinoChi said:
Should this be tagged onee-shota? Nothing else with the male character is tagged as shota
Onee-shota posts don't automatically qualify for shota, mainly because the relationship can be portrayed in a more mild manner. However, I'm not convinced onee-shota would apply here because you can't really tell whether there's an actual age difference or not.
Freshblink said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8149137?q=ass+from_behind+-dimples_of_venus+ loli or petite?
Loli
hdk5 said:
Yeah.
Blank_User said:
The proportions look pretty loli to me.
Is the hips not too wide to count as loli? post #5947926
post #5859254 Based on the source, I don't think there's a shota or loli at all here
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=pixiv%3A59754100 and post #6278481
Are these loli?
ziin1234 said:
Is the hips not too wide to count as loli? post #5947926
They are not too wide. There’s hardly anything there on the right.
I will say that the short proportions could be due to an anatomical error. It looks like the upper half of her stomach was removed and the two remaining parts sewn together. But that doesn’t change the fact that she has loli proportions in that image.
ziin1234 said:
post #5859254 Based on the source, I don't think there's a shota or loli at all here
All we care about is how the character appears in the image. Canon appearance is irrelevant. That said, I’m leaning no towards shota.
Obviously, the woman in this image is not a loli.
ziin1234 said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=pixiv%3A59754100 and post #6278481
Are these loli?
Leaning towards no on the first one. The second one is a boy, and I’m not sure whether or not it counts as shota.
hdk5 said:
Not at all suggestive enough to warrant the tag
Should this post be tagged Loli? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8410230
DragonPulsar said:
Should this post be tagged Loli? https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8410230
Petite.
Blank_User said:
All we care about is how the character appears in the image. Canon appearance is irrelevant. That said, I’m leaning no towards shota.
Obviously, the woman in this image is not a loli.
blindVigil said:
He probably meant the pixiv source, since he can't actually see that post.
post #5859254
BlindVigil is correct, I mean Pixiv source. Sorry if it wasn't clear
Blank_User said:
They are not too wide. There’s hardly anything there on the right.
post #5947926
Hmm, maybe it's because I can't clearly see the shoulder, but I thought the hips on the right was especially wide compared to the left one, almost like a pear even. If you say so though, I won't argue any more about it.