Donmai

Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

Kuchc Sorrin

tapnek said:

Need a check on this entire series.

pool #22849

Damn I'm new but she looks like the final boss of schrödinger lolis. She's only one head shorter than what looks like a grown man, and has slight breasts and hips, but in real life standards I would probably see her as a lolita. (who can be petite adults too, but people get weird in both ways) Her behavior doesn't seem childish. Although it seems most of the girls this artist draw are lolis. I would apply the upper rating anyway.

Updated

Reply
Kuchc Sorrin

tapnek said:

So loli?

I meant about the rating. the "Not Safe feel". I'm guessing it should apply to teens like that as well.
So general->sensitive, sensitive->questionable, and questionable->explicit (it's already like that anyway)

***

Another topic, I think I messed up on my own. :[ I was testing tags and edited too quickly before realizing that I couldn't revert my own edit because of the censor.
After checking farther it seems that kaban_(kemono_friends) is actually never tagged as a loli/child most of the time.

So can someone else remove the loli tag here ? (explicit asf) https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4513183

Reply
ANON TOKYO

tapnek said:

Need a check on this entire series.

pool #22849

I *think* that's petite.

Kuchc_Sorrin said:

I meant about the rating. the "Not Safe feel". I'm guessing it should apply to teens like that as well.
So general->sensitive, sensitive->questionable, and questionable->explicit (it's already like that anyway)

***

Another topic, I think I messed up on my own. :[ I was testing tags and edited too quickly before realizing that I couldn't revert my own edit because of the censor.
After checking farther it seems that kaban_(kemono_friends) is actually never tagged as a loli/child most of the time.

So can someone else remove the loli tag here ? (explicit asf) https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/4513183

Done.

Reply
Blank User

Kuchc_Sorrin said:

I meant about the rating. the "Not Safe feel". I'm guessing it should apply to teens like that as well.
So general->sensitive, sensitive->questionable, and questionable->explicit (it's already like that anyway)

The character's apparent age usually has no effect on ratings. The main exception is children in age-inappropriate dress that a teen or adult could get away with wearing in a G-rated post, in which case it might qualify as loli or shota with an S rating.

Simple nudity is Q. Visible penises, blatantly exposed female genitalia, and blatantly visible sexual acts are E. Everything already has the NSFW ratings. There's no reason to increase the rating further just because the character looks a little young.

Reply
Blank User

Veraducks said:

I feel like it's an annoying split. Some I definitely say are loli. Some I can't say either way. Some are definitely petite.

I don't see any significant difference in her physique among these posts. I know we normally consider each post on its own, but since these are meant to be seen together and the character looks the same age in all of the posts, I think it would be better to pick one or the other. Any differences between them seem too small to me to justify tagging them differently.

I vote for petite on all of them.

Reply
Kuchc Sorrin

Blank_User said:

The main exception is children in age-inappropriate dress that a teen or adult could get away with wearing in a G-rated post, in which case it might qualify as loli or shota with an S rating.

Everything already has the NSFW ratings. There's no reason to increase the rating further just because the character looks a little young.

Yep that's what I said, the rating is already increased, but I wanted confirmation about my feelings for this character in particular because she looks like quite an example. So she would've been adult enough in a "sexy adult" general rating setting ?

Reply
1 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 225