Aneroph_Q said:
I say no. It doesn't look sexually suggestive, just a run of the mill image.
Posted under General
Aneroph_Q said:
I say no. It doesn't look sexually suggestive, just a run of the mill image.
TirMcDohl said:
Not by our current use of the tag.
Ass and legs are too thick to be loli. Anyone that disagrees, please tell me why you do.
post #5748657 and its children I'm on the edge on. The legs and hips are generally wide enough but I need some confirmation from others.
TenaciousTurtleDucks said:
Not even a little bit.
post #5807092 is loli. The rest aren't.
What think about this post #5819807
post #311890, girl on right
Magicman98 said:
What think about this post #5819807
Yes.
Omo_Fan said:
post #311890, girl on right
Difficult for me to make a conclusion, tbh.
Omo_Fan said:
post #311890, girl on right
I would say yes, also on second girl from the right.
Is post #5219492 and it's children loli? I feel like it is, but i'd like to make sure.
post #5848046 and children
Jigsy said:
As for my earlier reply, I got the order mixed up. orz
Anyway...
Leaning yes.
Omo_Fan said:
Is post #5219492 and it's children loli? I feel like it is, but i'd like to make sure.
Yes, unless she's a halfling or something.
Jigsy said:
post #5848046 and children
Coin toss on this one. Her thighs and head size suggests yes. her upper body looks more teen. Her genitals are just abominable.
post #5848966 and children
ion288 said:
Kadoya said:
My loli-dar needs tuning.
post #5755490Leaning no, but it is borderline.
I agree on the no part, but if people still decide it's a loli then the parent probably needs to get tagged too since they're pretty much the same picture
Also I request checking for these:
1. post #5811848 (too tall to be "true shota")
2. post #515896 (breast and hips are probably too developed for danbooru's loli)
3. post #608586 (ass and thighs)
*4. Parent of post #2513842. I didn't see the art, but if it's anything like the child it shouldn't count
Updated
ziin1234 said:
I agree on the no part, but if people still decide it's a loli then the parent probably needs to get tagged too since they're pretty much the same picture
Also I request checking for these:
1. post #5811848 (too tall to be "true shota")
2. post #515896 (breast and hips are probably too developed for danbooru's loli)
3. post #608586 (ass and thighs)
about post #5811848
The artist, themselves, consider the kid to be shota. Hence the tag
https://twitter.com/Drasdr7513/status/1585646317560164354?s=20&t=ARKJfIFNCneTVfUrsjYeXg