fmyoen said:
post #508754Image is in high resolution, not poorly drawn, 12 people add it to favourites and as for what depicted it's just a typical large_insertion post.
*facepalms*
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
fmyoen said:
post #508754Image is in high resolution, not poorly drawn, 12 people add it to favourites and as for what depicted it's just a typical large_insertion post.
*facepalms*
Lets see some approved images:
I don't see any advantages of these images over my one except that all of them were posted by contributors. Also I don't know about any explicit content restrictions on danbooru. I just can't understand what prohibitions http://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service were violated by my posts. I even had to appeal deletion of post #493632. Such unclear image posting policies are pretty discourageous.
Woohoo, first time I get to quote myself for something I said on the same page.
recklessfirex said:
You might want to go back and read page 1 again.
.
.
.
Although, that being said, I must admit post #512426 made me go "uhh... wow, wth?"
fmyoen said:
- post #512583 - poorly drawn, explicit content
- post #512508 - disgusting, explicit content
- post #512337 - explicit content
1: Explicit content is not banned. Where the hell do you think you are? Take a wrong turn at Albuquerque?
2: post #512583?! Poorly drawn?! You, sir, are full of various kinds of mammalian droppings and I express my displeasure with such fully and with VIGOR.
Kayako said:
2: post #512583?! Poorly drawn?! You, sir, are full of various kinds of mammalian droppings and I express my displeasure with such fully and with VIGOR.
Since I can't clearly understand the reason behind my post wasn't approved, I make assumptions. One of them is "picture from my post was poorly drawn". So I found one with EQUIVALENT QUALITY compared to mine. If my assumption is right, then, yes, post #512583 is poorly drawn, if not -- both pictures aren't poorly drawn. Do you see? It's quite an interesting situation when explicit content aren't prohibited and picture quality is OK, but it still remains unapproved.
recklessfirex said:
Woohoo, first time I get to quote myself for something I said on the same page.
Thanks Captain, but your advice is useless as usual. What I'm talking about is that it looks that rule "An image is approved if anyone from the above group likes it enough to approve it" is the main one. For example, if "anyone" of mods likes Touhou, he will approve even low quality/dull/disgustiong/and so on images, cause he likes the theme. But if he feel nothing towards, for example, Type-Moon, even good images may remain unapproved, cause they're nothing special from his poing of view.
Fencedude said:
Seriously, that image was terrible.
Please, just don't say that the post #410660 is better, lol. But it was approved. Here is another thing for you to think about: my image was favourited more times during APPROVE PERIOD than post #410660 for 6 months.
Another example (for recklessfirex too): Guy with the permissions may personally don't like dickgirls, but he will approve posts with them, cause so many peolpe like dickgirls and it's so cool and weeaboo. But he will unapprove other deviations, which niether better nor worse than dickgirls, they're just less popular. Is that the case?
fmyoen said:
Thanks Captain, but your advice is useless as usual.
Here, I'll just copy and paste it here since you apparently didn't see it on page 1:
6) Never expect or demand feedback or justification. You may get some, if anyone feels like providing it or has anything specific to say. However there are too many appeals and too many other things for us to do for us to have time to critique every appeal.
.
.
And then for this one,
fmyoen said:
Here is another thing for you to think about: my image was favourited more times during APPROVE PERIOD than post #410660 for 6 months.
Score/favorites don't carry any weight at all for this kind of thing. Seriously.
fmyoen said:
Another example (for recklessfirex too): Guy with the permissions may personally don't like dickgirls, but he will approve posts with them, cause so many peolpe like dickgirls and it's so cool and weeaboo. But he will unapprove other deviations, which niether better nor worse than dickgirls, they're just less popular. Is that the case?
lol @ weeaboo comment
Also, the process is plain and simple. Good art goes through. Bad art does not. Subjective? Yes. Unless it's newly posted somewhere and I don't know about it, Danbooru never claimed to be objective. It's true that mods/janitors may pass on things that aren't relevant to their interests, but then that's why this thread exists if something slips through the queue. Appeal, and if the quality is good, it should get approved. Otherwise, move on.
fmyoen said:
I will. It was pretty stupid to make a negative record as a reply to my attempts to understand your policies.
1) Ain't my policies. I'm not even a mod.
2) I wasn't the one that gave you the neg.
FWIW, I've had pics I liked that didn't go through either but that's how it works. If something looks like it's not going to survive the gauntlet, just save it to your HD.
post #510440 (It is partially translated)
post #509825
post #506565
post #508680
post #508688
post #508691
all have translation notes and are related to post #508693 (accepted)
post #510824 child was uploaded by a janitor
Mr_GT said:
post #510341
Seriously? 100MB?
Mr_GT said:
post #510341
Let this be a lesson to you.