post #561377
Official art of Hiyama Kiyoteru. Since both Miki and Yuki had their officials approved. I would hope that this vocaloid can have his... since he doesn't have a lot of artwork up to begin with.
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
post #561377
Official art of Hiyama Kiyoteru. Since both Miki and Yuki had their officials approved. I would hope that this vocaloid can have his... since he doesn't have a lot of artwork up to begin with.
Could these get a second look please?
post #561678
This is well drawn and a comparable resolution to others of this character. It was also favorited by 24 people before it expired.
post #561441
This one was a good resolution, a favorite of 16 people and, I believe, part of a set of which there are others that were approved. Also, imo, beautifully drawn.
post #561434
Tasteful nude, favorited by almost 30 people before it got deleted.
post #561424
High-res image, also freaking excellent artwork. I think it's valid as a child to post #325687.
Thanks for your consideration!
Sorry, I couldn't see two because of my member status. I'd also like to request a second look at these:
I know that's six out of the eight deleted, but I believe these are high quality and deserve a second look. Thanks again for your consideration!
I'd like to appeal post #559941.
It has a score of 6, and is favored by 19 people.
Ive already appealed this post #559192 but can someone tell me what's wrong with it that it failed to get approved or even looked at in the appeal? I really liked it and was put off by how it didn't make the cut for whatever reason.
post #562359
post #562360
Adaptations of SFC-era 'sprite' art (as seen here and here (under "job change system")). They have a novelty value.
post #560248
post #560241
post #560240
post #560238
These posts and four others are part of a series, and all of the other ones have gotten through.
Rasberry said: post #561424
High-res image, also freaking excellent artwork. I think it's valid as a child to post #325687.
But that's the thing, is it original? It screams shop, with the way the feet were cut off, the awkward look of the fingertip nearest the viewer. Also where the horns would have been removed it looks like some evidence was left behind.
There's a similarly cropped child with the horns and all, but I did not approve this one because I'm not sure it'd original.
Fixed version of post #549982.
