post #3212683
post #3213643
post #3193926
Anatomy-wise they seem ok...what would cause these to not make the cut?
Updated
Posted under General
post #3212683
post #3213643
post #3193926
Anatomy-wise they seem ok...what would cause these to not make the cut?
Updated
Only one post and I've appealed this already before, but it's still bugging me why it wasn't approved because I can't see the problem. Is it about how her upper torso is twisted (which isn't out of the ordinary for poses like this IMO)? post #3183442
Could someone please take another look at it? :/
EDIT: Thank you!
Updated
The one without text got accepted but this one didn't? And it's still really good art from Boris? wtf.
Please give this one a chance.
Touhou
Sorry bad connection had made me post this twice by mistake.
Updated
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/3220116
Now what the fuck's wrong with this one? Getting sick of every damn thing I upload getting deleted.
DragonKnightGX said:
post #3220116
This one in particular has some low-quality texturing on the background elements that contrast with the style used for the girl. I think the legs look a little bit off as well.
Honestly, from what you've been posting (most of which is borderline quality-wise) it seems like there just isn't a whole lot of moderator interest in the Jewelpet series.
Is it a good idea to upload https://twitter.com/twdshamano/status/1027671216104980480/video/1 as a children to post #3136514 ?
c933103 said:
Is it a good idea to upload https://twitter.com/twdshamano/status/1027671216104980480/video/1 as a children to post #3136514 ?
Not really.
post #3229714 (parent & child)
How come this 3 didnt get approve yet post #3229680 & post #3227873 managed to do so?
Kyusey said:
Personally I didn't really overall like the picture. It's not bad but it's not really good either, it kinda sits in that limbo where you have to hope it tickles someone enough for them to approve it. It might be because of the crotch area looking pretty weird and the shading being inconsistent, but these are just nitpicks.
Chimera99 said:
post #3229714 (parent & child)
How come this 3 didnt get approve yet post #3229680 & post #3227873 managed to do so?
For the first, the guy looks like a cardboard cutout, and for the second the breasts are just 2big4me. Most approvers skip on gigantic breasts.
Little confused due to the parent being approved very quickly. If it's because it was marked as a Twitter sample, it was replaced with the original.
I think I'm getting better at the whole "sharing stuff on the Internet" thing, but there's nothing wrong with getting other folks' opinions here!
post #3215668, post #3227174: I don't see anything particularly wrong with these that can't be excused by the art style. Part of me is honesty curious about Danbooru's stance on video game fanart...
post #3232595: I think it's something do with the how the clothes look on her? Or maybe the size differences? I think anatomy is held up to a high standard here, but I'm no artist.
post #3233663: The messy hair make this image look a little sketchy (literally), but otherwise I'm not sure what the issue is here?
post #3240111: The lens flare looks a bit off at Marie's feet, but I'm not sure if that's too much of a problem here.
Updated
calvinhobbes1010 said:
I think I'm getting better at the whole "sharing stuff on the Internet" thing, but there's nothing wrong with getting other folks' opinions here!
post #3215668, post #3227174: I don't see anything particularly wrong with these that can't be excused by the art style. Part of me is honesty curious about Danbooru's stance on video game fanart...
Eh, the art style is imporant. imo that is pretty much the first tick if an approver want to spent time for closer inspection. Like post #3215668 I would just shove it away without looking beyond the thumbnail and continue my 10 page of backlog.
As for post #3227174 imo it's more that pokemon doesn't get much interest from the approvers.
post #3232595: I think it's something do with the how the clothes look on her? Or maybe the size differences? I think anatomy is held up to a high standard here, but I'm no artist.
Gaintess is one of the nitch thing, so it need to be compensated with quality. In my eyes the hip area is a bit off.
post #3240111: The lens flare looks a bit off at Marie's feet, but I'm not sure if that's too much of a problem here.
Western style art.
post #3243624 How come this one doesn't get approved yet post #3243613 got approved very quickly? I'm getting very pissed off by the fact that works from the same artist don't get approved for no plausible reason.