Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

brttkxx said:

Curious why these didn't get approved, just for reference moving forward, please:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8517167
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8516253
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8513461
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8509411

Thanks!

Where are the sources?? They are not optional. -> help:upload
You also left no copyright tag whatsoever on some of those, leaving anyone to guess where those characters come from and if they have a tag themselves, even if that part isn't technically a necessity for approval, you should do your best efforts to provide those anytime you upload.

Alto1867 said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8514321

Since I'm already a pain in the ass already

Why did this got deleted. What was so wrong with it ? Is it the face or something ? Or I assume the approvers simply aren't big fans of this artist works ?

I looked at it several times and I couldn't see the issue

Some of the others I can sorta get. Weird anatomy and all. But why this ?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8515714

This one too. It seems like a pretty nice pic to me as well. What was the problem with it ?

You'd think that someone who wants feedback that badly would catch someone responding to them already 2 times but here we are.

• post #8514321 my take: may be the proportions, especially with the hand being too big, among others; may be the combo of this being a sketch + this coloring, sketches aren't bad to upload but with certain characteristics added, it can look not good enough for approvers' tastes, boiling down to "it's meh". May be the low amount or approvers viewing it too. It could be a mix of all 3.
• post #8515714 Low amount of approver reviews. However even without that i'd be surprised if it was approved, it doesn't look as good as you think, i personally wouldn't call it Bad, but a messy sketch of unremarkable composition with flat colors that aren't very well picked is quite unlikely to find an approver that likes it, so you're in need of luck with that one especially.

Can anyone check these again?

post #8519745
post #8447994
post #7944166
post #7931945
post #7931945
post #7931799
post #8418394

Mayhem-Chan said:

Where are the sources?? They are not optional. -> help:upload
You also left no copyright tag whatsoever on some of those, leaving anyone to guess where those characters come from and if they have a tag themselves, even if that part isn't technically a necessity for approval, you should do your best efforts to provide those anytime you upload.

I made sure to add the artist tag, is that not what you mean by copyright tag, though? I also wrote in which characters when I knew characters. Is there anything else I needed to provide? Thank you!

brttkxx said:

I made sure to add the artist tag, is that not what you mean by copyright tag, though? I also wrote in which characters when I knew characters. Is there anything else I needed to provide? Thank you!

Please disregard, I read the help:upload link you provided and understand more clearly. Thank you!

post #8519525

It's clearer than the approved post, and it doesn't have a copyright watermark.

post #8516177
post #8516174

post #8520831

Only checked by 6 approvers post #8518996

Just curious, what's wrong with post #8518964 ?

Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #6344403
post #6226100
post #6463577

Hello, I'd like a second opinion on the proportions on these posts.
post #8460779 (is it mainly the stomach's muscles?)
post #8355449
post #8355448 (feet's and breasts I suppose?)

elysialover said:

Just curious, what's wrong with post #8518964 ?

My guess is maybe the foreshortening of her body on the left drawing?

SidBarrett said:

Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.
post #6344403
post #6226100
post #6463577

Can't comment on the others, but post #6226100 looks like it was an older piece of work by the artist since the overall quality (e.g. linework, shading) has greatly improved in their newer works after they purged their Pixiv account.

FivePastNever said:

Hello, I'd like a second opinion on the proportions on these posts.
post #8460779 (is it mainly the stomach's muscles?)
post #8355449
post #8355448 (feet's and breasts I suppose?)

post #8460779: Probably the portions of the legs, as in, the right one would look smaller than her left one if she extended it.
post #8355449 and post #8355448: Shading and/or overall art style maybe?

Seems odd that both of these got deleted when the prior works from the same artist, of the same quality, were both approved. Seems like it may have gotten buried as only 5 approvers even looked at them. I'd appeal but I neither have the slots, nor the confidence that it would work lol.

post #8522687
post #8522685

post #8507692
post #8507672

Anything wrong with these? They look perfectly fine to me. I honestly don't get why these artworks aren't getting the seal of approval. These are on the same level of quality as some of the other pictures drawn by the same artist. Or is it just a lack of interest in this franchise? Maybe it's my fault for not catering towards what people are actually interested in, or is it just pure ignorance? Like, I get that the Ultra Series is rather niche amongst the majority of people here, but this is ridiculous, even for me.

post #8506406

need feedback on what is wrong with this post other than i stitched two images into one, i don't get nor find what's wrong with the artwork.

Realhi87 said:

Seems odd that both of these got deleted when the prior works from the same artist, of the same quality, were both approved. Seems like it may have gotten buried as only 5 approvers even looked at them. I'd appeal but I neither have the slots, nor the confidence that it would work lol.

post #8522687
post #8522685

The low amount of views certainly is a factor, but the two other posts of this artist were not approved, they bypassed the queue, and they also look better imo.

NoIdea4GoodName said:

My guess is maybe the foreshortening of her body on the left drawing?

The foreshortening is fine actually. Bottom drawing is the one with issues but idk if that's the factor.

post #8460779: Probably the portions of the legs, as in, the right one would look smaller than her left one if she extended it.
post #8355449 and post #8355448: Shading and/or overall art style maybe?

post #8460779: the slightly inaccurate proportion of the leg is too insignificant to be the reason, the size of the head + Overdefinition all over the stomach + overall style is more likely
post #8355449 and post #8355448 is not a matter of artstyle (if you ask me, what counts as style in there looks rather nice), it's just niche fetish art that is drawn amateurishly, with bad anatomy at that, which is much less likely to get approved

Dynastes_king said:

post #8516174

also clearly bad anatomy

post #8524491

^^ Huh, your second opinions are pretty helpful in seeing the larger picture of what's wrong, instead of the finer details (a trait that I have - it's helpful for tagging/*_request).

zerotoinfinity said:

post #8507692
post #8507672

Anything wrong with these? They look perfectly fine to me. I honestly don't get why these artworks aren't getting the seal of approval. These are on the same level of quality as some of the other pictures drawn by the same artist. Or is it just a lack of interest in this franchise? Maybe it's my fault for not catering towards what people are actually interested in, or is it just pure ignorance? Like, I get that the Ultra Series is rather niche amongst the majority of people here, but this is ridiculous, even for me.

Only thing I can assume why it wasn't approved (aside from the lack of approvers having an interest in tokusatsu) is that December is a month where a lot of stuff happens; final exams, holiday rushes, botched work schedules, general end-of-year responsibilities, etc. It might not apply here but it's something I've noticed in previous messages on this thread when someone mentions how many approvers checked a certain post.

NoIdea4GoodName said:

Only thing I can assume why it wasn't approved (aside from the lack of approvers having an interest in tokusatsu) is that December is a month where a lot of stuff happens; final exams, holiday rushes, botched work schedules, general end-of-year responsibilities, etc. It might not apply here but it's something I've noticed in previous messages on this thread when someone mentions how many approvers checked a certain post.

Oh, is that why?

I guess I was a lil' bit miffed as to why this was the case. The fact that no one is batting an eye towards my Ultraman-related posts, which could explain why my record of posting stuff isn't thriving, as of late.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5971112
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7002048
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8452404

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8143792
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8143799
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8143822

Heya 👋. If its alright, can I ask if there was a specific reason for https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8528299?q=user%3AHoshizoraa being unapproved?(As I personally believe its of high quality)

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8530289?q=user%3AAlto1867

What's wrong with this ?