Please read: an appeal from our founder, Daniel Booru.
Donmai

Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

Mayhem-Chan

NoIdea4GoodName said:

Her head looks off center from her neck. I can see why it was flagged for anatomy problems.

Honestly the head is the least of the problems here, the whole body is badly proportioned and structured and the foreshortening on it was overapplied on the arm but not applied on the torso+abdomen for some reason.
I see this artist tends to have glaring anatomy issues in their work, which is a shame, since the style has good potential to me

Reply
Kawaii3Chan

jxh2154 said:

People have been asking for a thread where feedback on uploads could be obtained. So here it is. I have some reservations about how acrimonious this thread is likely to get, and if it turns into nothing more than a flame-fest, I will lock it.

Rules for those requesting feedback:
#1 - You are not guaranteed feedback. It is entirely voluntary to give it.
#2 - Danbooru may simply not be an appropriate place for your favorite art. If so, accept this and move on.
#3 - Try not to be too thin-skinned,and don't take things personally.

Rules for those giving feedback:
#1 - Give constructive feedback only.
#2 - Refrain from name-calling. Asking people to be thick-skinned doesn't mean you're allowed to be insulting.

Yes! I now flagged post because it's so low quality or poor

Reply
WRS

Mayhem-Chan said:

To me, the face on the left is wonky, and the arms + shoulders are quite thin compared to the torsos

Fair enough, with your added feedback, when I take a second look, it does look a little flat and the arms look a bit thin. I should've paid more attention to this one. Another silly avoidable anatomy mistake. Those get you real good most of the time.

Reply
glousk

glousk said:

post #8498232
post #8498257

I'm quite new here but these two upload I've made were not approved and I'm wondering why.
I do understand they're quite similar to their parents, however i'm seeing a lot of duplicates with the very same resolution being approved (like post #8511808 with post #8511813 (is there something I am missing ?)), or others cropped post like post #8491009 being approved.
What's the rule of thumb to follow here ?

Bumping this because I need an answer

Reply
argentb

glousk said:

Bumping this because I need an answer

In general, art variants need to provide something significantly different, be of a higher resolution, or be a step up from the previous/other versions. Of these, #849232 provides a different context compared to the other three, but, for me, its not enough of a difference from #7564791. Similarly, the zoom-in for #8498257 is captured in #8499456.

"Now, what's the difference between the ones that were posted?" Well... while I can't say the -exact- reasons (I didn't approve these), one thing I do notice is the timing of the submissions. #8511808 was uploaded shortly before #8511813. The second one is a higher quality version, so it would count. Similarly, #8491009 was posted before #8499456, which means that, on first pass, the earlier one may approve and the "higher resolution, significantly different" factor would play in. I would like to give the benefit of the doubt on the reprints that the lower resolution one was done before finding the higher quality one, likewise #8491009 was posted earlier in the day compared to the next one.

Also, it's important to note that the second art is submitted by a contributor. Their art is approved automatically so there may be times when stuff would get approved which the approval process may not see get through.

Reply
glousk

argentb said:

In general, art variants need to provide something significantly different, be of a higher resolution, or be a step up from the previous/other versions. Of these, #849232 provides a different context compared to the other three, but, for me, its not enough of a difference from #7564791. Similarly, the zoom-in for #8498257 is captured in #8499456.

"Now, what's the difference between the ones that were posted?" Well... while I can't say the -exact- reasons (I didn't approve these), one thing I do notice is the timing of the submissions. #8511808 was uploaded shortly before #8511813. The second one is a higher quality version, so it would count. Similarly, #8491009 was posted before #8499456, which means that, on first pass, the earlier one may approve and the "higher resolution, significantly different" factor would play in. I would like to give the benefit of the doubt on the reprints that the lower resolution one was done before finding the higher quality one, likewise #8491009 was posted earlier in the day compared to the next one.

Also, it's important to note that the second art is submitted by a contributor. Their art is approved automatically so there may be times when stuff would get approved which the approval process may not see get through.

It makes sense, thank you a lot for the thorough explanation

Reply
Mayhem-Chan

Alto1867 said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8514321?q=user%3AAlto1867
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8515714?q=user%3AAlto1867
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8516603?q=user%3AAlto1867
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8517372?q=user%3AAlto1867

What is wrong with these ? What's the problem? It's taking way too long for these to get approved

Alto1867 said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8514321?q=user%3AAlto1867

What's wrong with this post ? It looks fine to me. What's wrong with it ? And what can I do to make it better ?

Stop spamming the thread to beg about posts that are still in the modqueue

Reply
NiceLittleDan

Not sure on some of these so please feel free to feedback on any of them if you have both time and an opinion.

post #8514543 It's a facial expression change for something two contributers have previously uploaded. Is there an issue with uploading this variant in particular?

post #8512321
post #8512314 Both of these are from an artist with limited deleted works. I know that's not necessarily enough to be approved but it's similar to most of their work in terms of style.

post #8500220 I assume it's the breast positioning but she is drawn like that sometimes so thought it'd be fine.

Reply
Alto1867

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8514321

Since I'm already a pain in the ass

Why did this got deleted. What was so wrong with it ? Is it the face or something ? Or I assume the approvers simply aren't big fans of this artist works ?

I looked at it several times and I couldn't see the issue

Some of the others I can sorta get. Weird anatomy and all. But why this ?

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8515714

This one too. It seems like a pretty nice pic to me as well. What was the problem with it ?

Updated

Reply
1 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 516