imply animal_ear_piercing -> ear_piercing

BUR #18625 has been rejected.

create implication animal_ear_piercing -> piercing

Implication for a newly created tag

Considering forum #248898, why doesn't this imply ear piercing instead (which will automatically add piercing as well)?

looks like i messed up

NightjarInaJar said:

looks like i messed up

It's ok, you can click on "bulk update request #18625" above to edit it.

Unbreakable said:

Considering forum #248898, why doesn't this imply ear piercing instead (which will automatically add piercing as well)?

Actually, wouldn't it be better not to do so? As there can be piercing on animal ears only (post #6138335, post #6362053)

NightjarInaJar said:

Actually, wouldn't it be better not to do so? As there can be piercing on animal ears only (post #6138335, post #6362053)

I don't manage to see a problem with that

They mean if we need a distinction between just animal_ear piercing and just ear piercing for search-ability, I think.

pronebone said:

They mean if we need a distinction between just animal_ear piercing and just ear piercing for search-ability, I think.

yes

That's a fair concern, is there that many posts to be tagged animal ear piercing that it would fill the pages to an unreasonable degree when searching ear piercing?

NightjarInaJar said:

Actually, wouldn't it be better not to do so? As there can be piercing on animal ears only (post #6138335, post #6362053)

I agree, extra ears isn't uncommon.

So, shall i edit it back

By the way, next time instead of editing the BUR create a new one instead. People who put their vote on one BUR may not see your new edits on it if they don't check the thread. And it'll be easier to distinguish what people want more that way.

Animal ear piercing appears to be just earrings but for animal ears. If we have it imply piercing instead of earrings and start making tags like hoop piercing (topic #24632), then we're going to end up recreating all the *_earrings tags, except this time for animal ears.

evazion said:

Animal ear piercing appears to be just earrings but for animal ears. If we have it imply piercing instead of earrings and start making tags like hoop piercing (topic #24632), then we're going to end up recreating all the *_earrings tags, except this time for animal ears.

Animal ear piercing is for ear piercings that are on the animal ears specifically, and i have a hard time finding cases under it that i would definitely tag earrings instead of ear piercing (bringing to my attention the number of earrings mistags in it), the only ones for which i have a doubt are the ones like post #6554282 and post #6579388 .
I don't think it's going to end up with an animal ears version of each *_earrings tag though and i don't see why it would given the purpose of animal ear piercing, and the creation of hoop piercing has nothing to do with animal ears, it looks distinct enough from hoop earrings on it's own, even when it's on ears, because it's a legit type of piercing; each type of piercing (and earring if it turns out there are actual earrings on animal ears but i didn't find any yet) can just be added on top of whichever post to be tagged animal ear piercing.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #18625 (forum #248920) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

What was the issue here exactly? We don't want earrings tagged on animal ear piercings? That's happening anyway.