@Diet_Soda I agree the new ones look assisted, but what makes posts like post #6873011 assisted?
Posted under General
@Diet_Soda I agree the new ones look assisted, but what makes posts like post #6873011 assisted?
post #7836913 is my upload but now I'm a bit suspicious it's generated, it's in one of those art styles where I really can't tell.
For comparison, here's the other two images: asset #22101782, asset #22101783
岩戸鈴芽 said:
@Diet_Soda I agree the new ones look assisted, but what makes posts like post #6873011 assisted?
IMO they're all assisted to the same degree, that is traced AI. They've been drawing for years and neither their newer or older posts have artifacts indicative of raw AI outputs, but if you scroll through their pixiv or twitter, at some point in 2023 they suddenly shifted their style and focus and started pumping out those samey poses at a pace of 1 fully rendered picture a day which is completely at odds with their pre-AI work. All their works posted here are from well past that breakpoint.
Heartcatcher said:
post #7836913 is my upload but now I'm a bit suspicious it's generated, it's in one of those art styles where I really can't tell.
For comparison, here's the other two images: asset #22101782, asset #22101783
All nijijourney, sadly. (Screenshot if you can't access lofter that way)
Diet_Soda said:
All nijijourney, sadly. (Screenshot if you can't access lofter that way)
Unfortunate, thank you. I mostly use Lofter from mobile.
Que? Looking at their previous works, seems so, there might be a more obvious tell I glazed over since I just woke up and saw someone upload it and did a brief check of the artist links supplied.
Confirmed on their Pixiv.
Updated
Satan-Sama said:
Is this artist using AI? Few futanari images as examples.
https://twitter.com/makoto_930futa/status/1777164985116025230
https://twitter.com/makoto_930futa/status/1769631434015416742
https://twitter.com/makoto_930futa/status/1770048985384038563
The artist replied to me via X's DM system stating that they actually draw the newer pictures they upload and use AI for coloring them.
Zero3K15 said:
The artist replied to me via X's DM system stating that they actually draw the newer pictures they upload and use AI for coloring them.
I'm not sure about that 'draw' part when you can clearly see a bunch of AI artifacts present in every image they post, and most of their works are pretty much dikko faces with difference shading
Updated
Hereinafter said:
Either not AI or at least redrawn/traced AI with inexperienced lineart and very lazy use of the Paint Bucket Tool
post #7849400
Even the flagger can't make up their mind.
岩戸鈴芽 said:
post #7849400
Even the flagger can't make up their mind.
Artist's Twitter and pixiv both state AI involvement, so most likely ai-generated, I guess.
Does look AI-y
岩戸鈴芽 said:
Does look AI-y
Not a raw output, but with the upscaling artefacts and inconsistencies it's almost certainly traced or collaged together from something, be it AI or another artist, I agree with comment #2433492's assessment.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7833493?q=kawaii_xgirl
Is from an known AI account kawaii_xgirl. Altho this one in particular does looks more assisted from a first look. However, after seeing the some parts of the frills, the wrist scrunchie and the choker, which suddenly stops at the left part of the neck, it makes me think its more generated.
(A bit hard to check it properly on mobile..)
Player_Diff said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7833493?q=kawaii_xgirl
Is from an known AI account kawaii_xgirl. Altho this one in particular does looks more assisted from a first look. However, after seeing the some parts of the frills, the wrist scrunchie and the choker, which suddenly stops at the left part of the neck, it makes me think its more generated.
(A bit hard to check it properly on mobile..)
Cringe AI account reposting other cringe AI accounts
Rest of the posts under this artist tag were Ai-generated and deleted.
Player_Diff said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7833493?q=kawaii_xgirl
Is from an known AI account kawaii_xgirl. Altho this one in particular does looks more assisted from a first look. However, after seeing the some parts of the frills, the wrist scrunchie and the choker, which suddenly stops at the left part of the neck, it makes me think its more generated.
(A bit hard to check it properly on mobile..)
Here's the original art post #6946870
https://x.com/putcherillust/status/1812170121894588583
I'm not sure about this one. The face seems to be of a different shade than the body. The shading is AI-like. The irises are of different sizes. Low resolution. But I can't find flaws or artefacts to definitely call it.
post #7821020
Flagged but nto tagged.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7855118?q=hira30917 sussy, looks like typical prompting stuff like https://x.com/CrownaRed/media
maybe just a redrawing? he's actually even reposting this https://x.com/mehlyru_/status/1800959311688106000
