704573r said:
Everything from batta 16-sei looks at least AI-assisted, especially the early stuff. I think the really shiny shading is the biggest indicator.
Seems like AI factory - the frequency of the arts is insane.
Posted under General
704573r said:
Everything from batta 16-sei looks at least AI-assisted, especially the early stuff. I think the really shiny shading is the biggest indicator.
Seems like AI factory - the frequency of the arts is insane.
post #6883786. The shading looks like AI, but more than that I am suspicious of the squiggles on the books in the top left corner, which look like the malformed letters that the AI generates. The whole bookcase looks very weird, with some of the books being just 2d spines, and then the next shelf down they are flat 3d boxes; there's a divider on two of the shelves that just stops and doesn't continue down into the third shelf from the top; the table behind the character (with the stack of books on it) is weird as well. Also, the hands seem to have been re-drawn; they are not consistent with the shading quality of the rest of the piece. Other parts of the image also appear to have received redrawing attention, though, such as the book the character is reading (a texture from some real text). The picture frame in the foreground also appears weird, it might be a crop of another drawing, or it could just be AI weirdness, but I can't tell-- it's hard to make anything out. All the other works from this artist don't seem to be in this AI-looking style so that also makes me suspicious. Anyways I'm not 100% sure
704573r said:
Everything from batta 16-sei looks at least AI-assisted, especially the early stuff. I think the really shiny shading is the biggest indicator.
Too hard to tell imo. The art style didn't change so much from before AI and now.
Marlor said:
Seems like AI factory - the frequency of the arts is insane.
Baseless comment. If you're looking at their pixiv, they are just one of those who upload everything they have worked on over the time at once. Their Twitter show their working steps rather clearly, from rough lineart all the way to the coloring. Also there are artists who clearly don't use AI who have an even more insane upload rate than this.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6893985 - not my flag but I'd flag it also. Yes, there're "work in progress steps" which show nothing as always.
Although I've uploaded this one, it's not actually classified as AI生成 on pixiv.
The eyes are kind of throwing me here. Unless it's ai-assisted?
Updated
Jigsy said:
Although I've uploaded this one, it's not actually classified as AI生成 on pixiv.
The eyes are kind of throwing me here. Unless it's ai-assisted?
Several blurry and obviously upscaled areas, especially noticeable are eyes and eyelashes, obligatory noise to cover things up all over the image, hair is quite some nonsense, some strange artifacts in the light purple area on the left, and I can’t figure out how her shoulder and neck are supposed to work behind that raised hand.
Alright. I'll tag it as ai-generated then.
Marlor said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6893985 - not my flag but I'd flag it also. Yes, there're "work in progress steps" which show nothing as always.
Seeing their Twitter, their artstyle changed quite suddenly and starkly. Definitely AI. But not sure if they're tracing and painting over AI or just using AI images. The former would be ai-assisted, so it's worth discussing.
8253803 said:
Seeing their Twitter, their artstyle changed quite suddenly and starkly. Definitely AI. But not sure if they're tracing and painting over AI or just using AI images. The former would be ai-assisted, so it's worth discussing.
I've been looking at this picture for the past 10 minutes and for the life of me I can't figure out where the disapprover saw "hair blending with skin on hand and face". It's obviously a traced AI image (and obviously touched up, even if the artist hadn't posted proof on our discord), but when I see statements like these that make shit up for no reason it makes me wonder what people are smoking.
Updated
https://www.pixiv.net/users/75419510
loli NSFW
It looks familiar to us, but after being fooled a few times, I have my doubts.
Pixiv's first post was uploaded on the 31st of last month, and X's account was banned for some reason. Was it because of the loli post? or the AI?
AkaringoP said:
https://www.pixiv.net/users/75419510
loli NSFWIt looks familiar to us, but after being fooled a few times, I have my doubts.
Pixiv's first post was uploaded on the 31st of last month, and X's account was banned for some reason. Was it because of the loli post? or the AI?
Yup that's AI with some low-effort post processing.
nonamethanks said:
I've been looking at this picture for the past 10 minutes and for the life of me I can't figure out where the disapprover saw "hair blending with skin on hand and face". It's obviously a traced AI image (and obviously touched up, even if the artist hadn't posted proof on our discord), but when I see statements like these that make shit up for no reason it makes me wonder what people are smoking.
If it's just touched up why it's ai-assisted if AI done 90% of the work?
Marlor said:
If it's just touched up why it's ai-assisted if AI done 90% of the work?
I think the point here is how we can determinate the percent of ai involved in some cases, I know there really obvious images are ai but we have a problem whit ai-assisted works, we need a standard for this cases, basically a ai will make a entire image not only a part all ai-assisted images are ai-generated, with an artist making little corrections we all are happy, this includes re-draw the outlines and eyes and hands, and other images maybe are ai involved and nobody notices it.
As I'm not familiar with the program, I'm going to poke in and see what people's thoughts are on the program "spinepro"
An example of this is the artist that I'm impressed with but also feel like it could be blurring the line a little (unsure)
https://www.tumblr.com/vrihedd/730538134043033600/no-happy-endings-in-night-city
What also helps is there is a bit of a display of their process:
https://www.tumblr.com/vrihedd/728007808865402880/backstage-of-my-previous-work-software-spine
Of what I can tell there is no AI utilization, or perhaps it would be AI-supported? Point is before messing around with something I'm not familiar, I figured I'd put it here and see what folks thought.
argentb said:
As I'm not familiar with the program, I'm going to poke in and see what people's thoughts are on the program "spinepro"
An example of this is the artist that I'm impressed with but also feel like it could be blurring the line a little (unsure)
https://www.tumblr.com/vrihedd/730538134043033600/no-happy-endings-in-night-city
What also helps is there is a bit of a display of their process:
https://www.tumblr.com/vrihedd/728007808865402880/backstage-of-my-previous-work-software-spine
Of what I can tell there is no AI utilization, or perhaps it would be AI-supported? Point is before messing around with something I'm not familiar, I figured I'd put it here and see what folks thought.
If we banned Spine we would also ban Live2d, they're both animation software that have nothing to do with the AI we're going against here.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6905332?q=tekken+
This is ai generated go check out their artstation there's so many obvious cases of this, this was their progress '' evidence '' btw https://twitter.com/KdeKercy/status/1727383455581766097 ..
If you check their other '' evidence '' for other stuff too it's just minor touch ups on already generated images and a ton of stuff on their artstation has the super generic stable diffusion style you see everywhere.
There's a lot of discussion on twitter atm about it and pretty widespread agreement that it's ai generated all of their '' evidence '' presented that its legit has been complete bullshit they have no actual progress WIP's and shots to show and like I said their arstation is filled with ai.
Chilly93 said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/6905332?q=tekken+
This is ai generated go check out their artstation there's so many obvious cases of this, this was their progress '' evidence '' btw https://twitter.com/KdeKercy/status/1727383455581766097 ..
If you check their other '' evidence '' for other stuff too it's just minor touch ups on already generated images and a ton of stuff on their artstation has the super generic stable diffusion style you see everywhere.There's a lot of discussion on twitter atm about it and pretty widespread agreement that it's ai generated all of their '' evidence '' presented that its legit has been complete bullshit they have no actual progress WIP's and shots to show and like I said their arstation is filled with ai.
https://twitter.com/emusheret6/status/1726773757346492819?s=20
The artist showed the time lapse, but twitter users aren't buying it.
I know I should've asked on here before posting, but is post #6907780 AI? Can't really tell myself, and if so, please feel free to delete it