Posted under General
HeyThereGuy said:
post #8559250 and post #8582542 by roribitanx are tagged as ai-generated.
This feels like a classic case of someone tagging based solely on the art style looking “AI-ish”.
Just want to say I flagged the Marisa one not only because of the look but also because of the double-sided broom which is a mistake I don't think a human would make. The whole thing from the hair to the shoes looks off and inconsistent but the broom is what pushed me to tag and flag.
Updated
Background may be AI, but I'm not sure if Mashiro is too. There's certainly a gap between posts.
post #8242162
post #8851143
post #8154645
All got flagged but re-approved. Considering the track record of the artist though I'm not sure if that is correct. The base image looks more AI than human to me. (And the Raiden one looks plain bad too.)
After informing user #1117061 that AI-generated art is against the rules in post #8865710, they started tagging their future uploads with AI-assisted and changed the changkiwi wiki to state this. I think they're probably just trying to get around the rules, but there's still a chance they're being honest.
Blank_User said:
After informing user #1117061 that AI-generated art is against the rules in post #8865710, they started tagging their future uploads with AI-assisted and changed the changkiwi wiki to state this. I think they're probably just trying to get around the rules, but there's still a chance they're being honest.
Based on the art itself as well as their Twitter bio I'm not buying that it's assisted:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8861498 star on twintail
Pasting my comment on post #8869869:
Be aware that this artist has an unusually high uploading rate and has tweeted asking about advice on AI generation.
Updated
@OhaiThar can you (or other people) explain why this should be regarded as assisted and not generated? The resolution and basically every finer detail when looking close screams, to quote the flagger, "AI slop".
post #8853234
Can someone verify this flag?
Marlor said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8861498 star on twintail
There's definitively some AI behind this.
They changed their art style like thrice in a short span of time and one of their tweets was quickly deleted
with several comments asking "is this ai generated"
ion288 said:
post #8853234
Can someone verify this flag?
The Twitter bio literally says it, just like the flag says.
Need a second opinion for this.
So, is Yuiyu Ki AI? This artist's style is all over the place despite the image being just around 3 months apart.
For example, comparing post #8871161 (latest work, which seems to have a hint of AI involvement) to post #8441347 and post #8064861.
ANON_TOKYO said:
@OhaiThar can you (or other people) explain why this should be regarded as assisted and not generated? The resolution and basically every finer detail when looking close screams, to quote the flagger, "AI slop".
I'm the one who made the flag, since at fight I assumed that this one is merely someone use this "artist's" style for AI slop generation.
But it turns out that after quick look to their Pixiv account, the images seems to be AI slop.
This is especially apparent when you compare the image that the "artist" has drawn prior to AI usage (pixiv #101639266) to the one that starts to have AI involved (pixiv #103783631) which have massive "improvement" in terms of basic anatomy and the AI-shading, despite both images were posted within 2 months.
tsukicorn needs a second look, asset #24949716 has prompt like data in the exif data
MonsutaKaado said:
tsukicorn needs a second look, asset #24949716 has prompt like data in the exif data
Even disregarding the AI prompt which proves it's likely entirely generated as any sort of image editing would've removed it, the hands on both that asset and post #8760957 are strange and appear nonsensical to me. The eyes in asset #24949716 are also slightly heterochromatic which would be a strange mistake for an actual artist to make.
r_cutiee is definitely using AI. They previously were flagged in post #8574513 and that flag was overturned, but this person's skill is bizarrely inconsistent in ways that make no sense. They've got great shapes in some places but AI-like nonsense in others, like in post #8888655: outlines are inconsistent, and the hair beneath her shows that kind of parting that AI does because it doesn't understand what hair actually is, despite all these other details that look much more clean and refined (at a glance). Over in post #8733731 we've got some very AI-looking finger silliness, and in post #8733702 we have all of the above: the man's hand in Momo's hair and its effect on her hair is completely ridiculous and makes no sense.
I don't know if they're tracing or just coloring over an AI's output or what, but these compositions are absolutely not their original work. I find their crying on Xitter pretty unconvincing too; who goes to all the work that it would take to produce the passable components of these images and decides to just quit because one single imageboard isn't being nice to them? This stuff is at the very least AI-assisted, and I don't think it meets standards well enough for a pass.
Just withdrawing all of this. It still looks fishy to me, but the more I look at it, the less comfortable I feel being certain AI is involved. It may just be someone whose skill with painting and such is much... much higher than their line work, anatomy, etc.
Updated
2xVision said:
r_cutiee is definitely using AI. They previously were flagged in post #8574513 and that flag was overturned, but this person's skill is bizarrely inconsistent in ways that make no sense. They've got great shapes in some places but AI-like nonsense in others, like in post #8888655: outlines are inconsistent, and the hair beneath her shows that kind of parting that AI does because it doesn't understand what hair actually is, despite all these other details that look much more clean and refined (at a glance). Over in post #8733731 we've got some very AI-looking finger silliness, and in post #8733702 we have all of the above: the man's hand in Momo's hair and its effect on her hair is completely ridiculous and makes no sense.
I don't know if they're tracing or just coloring over an AI's output or what, but these compositions are absolutely not their original work. I find their crying on Xitter pretty unconvincing too; who goes to all the work that it would take to produce the passable components of these images and decides to just quit because one single imageboard isn't being nice to them? This stuff is at the very least AI-assisted, and I don't think it meets standards well enough for a pass.
100% agree, imagine spending thousands of hours on learning how to actually draw and just quit - no real artist would do that
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=mewmirth&z=1 - pretty sus
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8786074?q=mewmirth - hands, wrong left armpit, strange collar, infinite noises
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8794509?q=mewmirth - already flagged by someone
Updated
post #8772189
Flagg without a tag.
