BUR #8188 has been rejected.
create alias bottom_pov -> taker_pov
create alias pov_(taker) -> taker_pov
Utility alias + missing implication
Posted under Tags
BUR #8188 has been rejected.
create alias bottom_pov -> taker_pov
create alias pov_(taker) -> taker_pov
Utility alias + missing implication
It can't implicate pov because there's posts like post #1696480 or post #3855088 or post #4642952 where the actual pov is not visible.
From the pov wiki
Note that usually a body part of the person whose point of view you're at is visible, such as a penis or an arm.
from that wording, I figured that a few exceptions can be made.
It wouldn't be very intuitive if different pov tags don't follow the same rules.
Here's some recent examples of pov being used without the viewer being visible: post #4973061 post #4973357
Well, I said that because of topic #17864.
So long as people don't start putting bottom pov instead of pov ass or pov from_below...
skylightcrystal said:
So long as people don't start putting bottom pov instead of pov ass or pov from_below...
That makes me a little uncertain about the bottom pov alias
The bulk update request #8188 (forum #201919) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.