Frevel said: If you take priviledged and contributor translator who (lets call it) specializes on translating stuff:
Criteria: TLs > 300 and level above normal as well as few posts (below 20)
From about 15 or so not ONE has more than hand full of forum posts (and therefore don't appear in this thread). Like I said, they pretty much don't seem to care much and/or have the appropriate tools to circumvent some restrictions. And they probably don't watch the forum quite often (if at all).
Just wanted to prove my point with data :)
Maybe it's because I just woke up but I'm a bit confused as to what you're saying here. Is it a suggestion to automate the process?
Even it's "counterproductive" for me to say this but invitational system should never (even remotly) get automatic.
Well, because if so, yeah, this is the problem. For evey type of contribution short of coding useful new tools, there's an easy way to inflate the statistics. Each invite I do is a result of a full investigation into number and types of posts, number and types of translations, tag edits, behavior in comments and on the forums, neg/pos records, how recently they were active, etc. I've invited a few people who turned out to be mistakes and want to avoid that so far as I can in the future. So you can't really automate that.
Nevertheless I'm rather disappointed in the direction where this tread is going. It's now more like a discussion of new userlevels and privileges some have over other. We actually still *don't* have any practical solution to the main problem yet since I still see "? translation request 5125".
Honeslty I don't think there is a solution. There's a lot of stuff nobody really cares about so it'll never get translated. The only way would be to automatically remove translation_request from posts when they get to a certain age, but honestly I think that's a bad idea.