create implication penis_on_face -> penis
Posted under Tags
create implication penis_on_face -> penis
First, penis on face lacks a wiki and should get one before any implication gets made.
Second, we need to establish whether a bulge counts for penis on face, as in the case of post #1047879. If it does, this implication won't work, because we don't use the penis tag unless it's exposed.
Provence said:
If penis means "exposed" then the post iridescent slime mentioned doesn't fit the other tag.
So penis on face should be something like "An exposed(!) penis touches another's or its owners face".
By that reasoning, the penis grab tag doesn't apply to post #1279291 or post #2288758.
Am I the only one who thinks interpreting tags in the most literal manner seems like splitting hairs? Insisting that penis must be in plain sight just because it's in the tag's name leaves us without any good way of searching for the action occurring in the aforementioned posts. We're actively impeding searchability for the sake of creating another implication, in spite of the philosophy albert espoused in forum #111232.
iridescent_slime said:
By that reasoning, the penis grab tag doesn't apply to post #1279291 or post #2288758.
Am I the only one who thinks interpreting tags in the most literal manner seems like splitting hairs? Insisting that penis must be in plain sight just because it's in the tag's name leaves us without any good way of searching for the action occurring in the aforementioned posts. We're actively impeding searchability for the sake of creating another implication, in spite of the philosophy albert espoused in forum #111232.
Stop your ranting^^. I think you made a good point.
I'd go with iridescent slime's opinion here to create a wiki for this tag so it would also include non-exposed penis. Should help make other posts like post #1047879 above easier to find with bulge penis_on_face.
Nitrogen09 said:
I'd go with iridescent slime's opinion here to create a wiki for this tag so it would also include non-exposed penis. Should help make other posts like post #1047879 above easier to find with bulge penis_on_face.
+1
+1, went ahead and wrote a penis on face wiki stating that it applies to bulges.
remove implication penis_in_panties -> penis
Same reasoning as penis on face: there are posts where the penis isn't exposed, it's just a bulge. See penis_in_panties bulge. Created in topic #7423 with no specific discussion of this implication.
Thanks evazion, also done the same thing to penis_grab wiki.
The bulk update request #919 has been approved.
Done. @evazion don't forget to modify penis_in_panties if necessary. Maybe some clean-up would be useful too.