Hard to tell if this is considered vandalism or not, but "Promoting Ukranian [sic] Genocide" shouldn't be used for flag reason, right?
Posted under General
Hard to tell if this is considered vandalism or not, but "Promoting Ukranian [sic] Genocide" shouldn't be used for flag reason, right?
"Quality check" is an extremely vague and biased reason to flag, just tell me what is wrong with this pic to be flagged https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5254711?q=raptor7
RIGperu said:
"Quality check" is an extremely vague and biased reason to flag, just tell me what is wrong with this pic to be flagged https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5254711?q=raptor7
I have no opinion about this particular pic, but it seems to me that "quality check" is the opposite of a biased reason. The point is to check with others and see what they think about the quality, right?
Quality check just means it needs a second look. Or maybe something the flagger feels like it should have gone trough the que in the case of unresctricted uploaders.
The quality check reason for a flag as vandalism topic is beating a dead horse. The flag reason doesn't matter.
If the post is good, it will get approved.
"Duplicates" on a post which isn't even a duplicate. double whammy
RIGperu said:
Correction: "if I personally like this post it will be approved" don't sugarcoat what ultimately is judgement based on personal opinion which is, in the end, biased.
The approval process is supposed to be biased. There is no sugar coating it. That's why there is more then 1 approver. It only takes one to approve a post. And approvers are allowed to have blacklists themselves.
I'm not sure where you get being biased is bad but that is the whole premise of danbooru.
Dannk said:
The approval process is supposed to be biased. There is no sugar coating it. That's why there is more then 1 approver. It only takes one to approve a post. And approvers are allowed to have blacklists themselves.
I'm not sure where you get being biased is bad but that is the whole premise of danbooru.
I guess I am just mad that I woke up to find 6 of my uploads flagged, one gets approved only to another new flag to immediately appear in a different pic. It makes me feel like i am being personally attacked. Specially when this gets flagged https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5250759?q=muumuu_%28sirufuruteienn%29 yet this other by the same artist is not https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5252060?q=muumuu_%28sirufuruteienn%29
RIGperu said:
I guess I am just mad that I woke up to find 6 of my uploads flagged, one gets approved only to another new flag to immediately appear in a different pic. It makes me feel like i am being personally attacked. Specially when this gets flagged https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5250759?q=muumuu_%28sirufuruteienn%29 yet this other by the same artist is not https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5252060?q=muumuu_%28sirufuruteienn%29
You have a less than 1% deletion ratio, and checking your flagged uploads whenever you complain about this, they're definitely some of the iffier posts. Flaggers are not robots, they're not obligated to go out of their way to flag similar looking posts just because they happened upon one of yours and thought it looked bad. 6 flags is hardly a scratch on your record. You're just as biased in this argument as everyone else, just accept the fact your uploads aren't totally untouchable.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5262866?q=user%3ARIGperu
>Amateur at best.
Now this is truly a super biased reason.
The unrestricted uploads permission is a privilege, not an excuse to post whatever you want. You're still subjected to the same quality rules as any other user.
Looking at your latest uploads I'm seeing several posts of questionable quality that would've never made it past the queue. The only thing you're achieving by complaining about flags is making me question whether you deserve the unrestricted permissions after all.
RIGperu said:
If you're going to misuse this thread to whine about valid flags you don't like, at least use post #123456 format instead of copy-pasting URLs like this is your first time visiting the forum.
post #5275241
"Quality"
I really have no problem with a simple "quality check", but if "quality" is what we're getting to, I think we don't need any flag reason at all.
Guaro said:
post #5275241
"Quality"I really have no problem with a simple "quality check", but if "quality" is what we're getting to, I think we don't need any flag reason at all.
How is that vandalism though? Citing quality as the flagging reason seems as valid as any given danbooru's whole deal is "archiving high quality art".
blindVigil said:
How is that vandalism though? Citing quality as the flagging reason seems as valid as any given danbooru's whole deal is "archiving high quality art".
Good, then I can go around and flag everything for "quality".
It's a useless reason, that doesn't provide anything. If the flag-reason box is only there so someone can write "quality" in it, then we can also just use a checkbox, because it makes the whole "providing a flagging reason" pointless. As an approver, who has to check 100 flags per day, it would be a bit more useful, to have a real flag reason to check for. One word isn't helpful at all.
Edit: "Quality" can mean anything. It can mean a whole "poor quality" flag, it could be "quality check", "questionable quality" etc. I just think, that we shouldn't go down to a level, where people only use "quality" as a whole flag reason. Just my opinion. I also didn't write it here, because of pure vandalism, but I won't start a new forum topic because of this.