Since crossed_legs already implies sitting, the tag crossed_legs_(sitting) is redundant.
Posted under Tags
Since crossed_legs already implies sitting, the tag crossed_legs_(sitting) is redundant.
Kikimaru said:
Since crossed_legs already implies sitting, the tag crossed_legs_(sitting) is redundant.
post #1409300 = crossed legs while standing, among other posts. And by that I mean posts where the tag is used without the character sitting.
If anything, why do we have separate tags for different positions of crossed_legs and it implied to sitting when it would make much more sense to have crossed_legs neutral than simply use the sitting, standing, or lying_down tags as needed?
Saduharta said:
post #1409300 = crossed legs while standing, among other posts.
Using the tag on that post is against the wiki definition of crossed_legs, which says it is for sitting only.
Why don't we alias crossed_legs to crossed_legs_(sitting)? It would clear up its usage, as well as be more consistent with crossed_legs_(lying) and crossed_legs_(standing). The name "crossed_legs" sounds like a catch-all tag for all three types of leg crossing.
Toks said:
Using the tag on that post is against the wiki definition of crossed_legs, which says it is for sitting only.
Why don't we alias crossed_legs to crossed_legs_(sitting)? It would clear up its usage, as well as be more consistent with crossed_legs_(lying) and crossed_legs_(standing). The name "crossed_legs" sounds like a catch-all tag for all three types of leg crossing.
You posted while I was editing my post, apologies.
Saduharta said:
You posted while I was editing my post, apologies.
Sorry, I responded too quickly.
Saduharta said:
If anything, why do we have separate tags for different positions of crossed_legs and it implied to sitting when it would make much more sense to have crossed_legs neutral than simply use the sitting, standing, or lying_down tags as needed?
That's not a bad idea either. It would at least be more intuitive, and tag combo searches like "crossed_legs standing" don't look like they would be any less accurate than the current crossed_legs_(standing) if posts were properly tagged with standing/sitting/lying.
I would vastly prefer crossed legs to be neutral and to use sitting, standing, and lying with it instead of these cumbersome to type crossed_legs_(*) tags.
Not only are they cumbersome, but they're unintuitive. There's no reason to believe crossed legs is exclusive to sitting character without stopping to read the Wiki for it.
jxh2154 said:
Yrs, agree with the neutral definition of crossed legs. All it needs to mean is that legs are crossed; add other tags as appropriate to flesh out the overall body position.
Bumping to create a resolution.
The options are
or
Kikimaru said:
Bumping to create a resolution.
The options are
- A. Remove implication crossed_legs -> sitting or
- B. Create alias crossed_legs -> crossed_legs_(sitting)
If we go with option A, we'll also need to alias the more specific tags to crossed_legs:
remove implication crossed_legs -> sitting
create alias crossed_legs_(sitting) -> crossed_legs
create alias crossed_legs_(lying) -> crossed_legs
create alias crossed_legs_(standing) -> crossed_legs
+1 for doing this, I think these subtags are a bit too specific and unnecessary.
Also: I just made sure all crossed_legs_(sitting/standing/lying) posts are tagged with sitting/standing/lying too, so that the aliases I mentioned can be done.