Crying is an action, tears are objects, so yeah an alias here seems very strange. Implication would work though.
Posted under General
forum #70938 seems relevant here. I've started using tearing up, but I haven't really seen anyone else. streaming tears only has 13 posts under it as well.
Alignn said:
Implication would work though.
Not sure about that. You can tell if someone's crying from other things like facial expression and rubbing one's eyes, so having visible tears isn't really necessary.
Edit: Like post #597231 for example. She's obviously crying, but we can't really see the tears.
Updated
Currently cry is still aliased to tears, afaics this alias should be moved to crying.
Same goes for crying_with_eyes_open tag. Although, in this case I'm not sure if we want tears -> crying implication or not.
So:
Remove alias cry -> tears
Create alias cry -> crying
and either
Create implication tears -> crying
or alternatively
Remove implication crying_with_eyes_open -> tears
Create implication crying_with_eyes_open -> crying
Updated
I would say it's possible to cry without tearing up, and as well it's possible for someone to be obviously crying, but no tears be visible to the viewer (facing away, etc). Just tag both when you see both.
There are certainly other causes of tears than crying (allergic reaction, laughing, sore eye, etc).