Donmai

Pointless Pools

Posted under General

่‘‰ๆœˆ said:
No, but she's exceptionally commonly depicted as such. The fanon has basically taken this meme and ran with it.

We also has exceptionally common pairings or characters with exceptionally common personality traits (I don't want to be boring, but examples from Touhou are countless), yet to utilize the system we will only add tags and pools that can be used by everyone across copyrights/characters. The most recent discussion related to this is to use rivalry tag instead of pooling Mokou vs Kaguya.

Perverted Homu is lovely, and she can be in the existing Perverted girls pool just fine. (I added all posts in the latter already.)

rantuyetmai said:
only add tags and pools that can be used by everyone across copyrights/characters.
Perverted girls pool

A general pool should certainly be favored over a character specific pool. I don't think the latter is needed at all, but I said the same about pool #1970, for which even any attempts to clean it up have been thwarted by users readding posts. Anyway, pool:perverted_girls akemi_homura is equivalent to pool:madoka_-_perverted_homura with no information lost..

Anelaid said:
I created a wiki for happy_tears, I think its worth tagging since its specific enough to be taggable and is separate enough for the typical reasons that tears are shown, which is either shyness, sadness, anger, fear, or frustration.

If it can be succinctly captured with two tags, then why bother with a combo tag?

ShadowbladeEdge said:
No it couldn't. The sex tag is only for anal and vaginal penetration. Sex in the context of happy_sex is any sexual practice.

I'm not sure if happy really qualifies for what happy tears is going for. It can be the same for this tag, A character can be happy and moved to tears but that is slightly different than happy. And the tears could come from an almost heart-warming moment as well or the character is happy in panel 1, but sad and crying in panel 2. Is happy going for subtle moments of happiness, or clear demonstrations of happiness

I don't see why sex is being limited to only penetration for that matter. Unless I missed something in the forums.

Anelaid said:
I'm not sure if happy really qualifies for what happy tears is going for. It can be the same for this tag, A character can be happy and moved to tears but that is slightly different than happy. And the tears could come from an almost heart-warming moment as well or the character is happy in panel 1, but sad and crying in panel 2. Is happy going for subtle moments of happiness, or clear demonstrations of happiness

smile tears, happy tears, whatever. Point is, you can find it easily with existing tags.

I don't see why sex is being limited to only penetration for that matter. Unless I missed something in the forums.

Try using the search bar for past discussion. That would help.

Hillside_Moose said:
Try using the search bar for past discussion. That would help.

I've tried, I get a lot of references to the policy of sex and that its confusing, but nothing on why it refers only to penetration. I get enough from what I've searched that its not going to change at any rate.

Hillside_Moose said:
smile tears, happy tears, whatever. Point is, you can find it easily with existing tags.

I disagree, a fair amount weren't tagged as smile and even fewer as happy.

Updated

ShadowbladeEdge said:
By my reckoning the only use happy_tears would have is weeding out false positives that crop up from having one character in a picture crying out of sadness or anger or what have you and another being happy.

Weeding out false positives is beneficial, yes?

I can see the value of it as a pool, but I'm not sure there are that many pictures that use that joke.

It could be made more general to include the removal of an accessory for all characters associated with one with that effect.

1 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 170