Does someone hate me here?

Hey,
someone changed an upload of mine.. i thought it's a joke so i changed it back.. now i see that all of my BIG Pics where changed, now it looks like that all of my pics r child posts, but that's not true.. they r bigger than the "parent" posts, and have better quality.

So if u read this buddy who changed it, come on and tell me what your problem is!

Bigger does not mean better. I looked at a few of your "big" images and they were just pointless upscales of the other version. They introduce more artefacts and blurring and no additional detail.

If it's you doing the upscales, stop that. Bigger is not better. More quality is better, and these aren't.

That's not true. post #177770 is a genuine high-res version of post #29411, just look at the detail on the lines. So is post #194026 vs post #149583. And post #177785 vs post #139886. And even post #177783 vs post #139885 (the latter even has some horrible jpeg artifacts).

So, yes, Jonin, someone hates you here. And I hate them for it. Keep uploading your high-resolution pictures, please.

i defenetly will, when i find good pictures to trade.
but i wonder how someone can have such a poor life that he needs to spent time in doing crap like this -.-

Hmm, it seems I mixed up the pics I was looking at, my apologies.

Anyway, this is why having a history of all the other post information like parent and rating would be useful. Then you could see who messed it up.

Jonin: all joking aside, I think it might have been a honest mistake on the part of whoever set up those parents.

piespy: agreed. I opened ticket #94 for that.

I don't specifically remember doing this with anything you uploaded, but I do know that about 2 out of 3 times I try to parents something I do it the wrong way around (ie, I put the parent that I intended to be the child). I usually go back and fix it when that happens, but I might not be the only one who has that problem.

Although it's a mega-selfish request, perhaps there could be a "child" field in the Edit menu in addition to the parent field? I know I could just not be stupid, but I reckon programming around my stupidity might be faster.

surasshu said:
Although it's a mega-selfish request, perhaps there could be a "child" field in the Edit menu in addition to the parent field? I know I could just not be stupid, but I reckon programming around my stupidity might be faster.

A post can have only one parent but many children, so.. IMO a child field is not necessary.

qwertyuiop said:
A post can have only one parent but many children, so.. IMO a child field is not necessary.

Oh yeah, that's true. I'll just have to become smarter! :D

Jonin said:
Hey,
someone changed an upload of mine.. i thought it's a joke so i changed it back.. now i see that all of my BIG Pics where changed, now it looks like that all of my pics r child posts, but that's not true.. they r bigger than the "parent" posts, and have better quality.

So if u read this buddy who changed it, come on and tell me what your problem is!

I don't know you enough to hate you, but I already hate your (lack of) spelling. Please read and follow forum #2156.

All i can do is TRYING to speak well. im not native english.
So it's not my Problem.

I am not, and never was, referring to your command of English. The only thing I care about is using netspeek like "u" or "r", and disregarding common punctuation rules like "after a fullstop comes a capitalised word". I can even understand problems with commas if you come from a language that doesn't use them, but those I mentioned don't even require any mental effort, hell, it requires conscious effort to substitute "you" with "u".

It is a little bit amusing to see someone complain about laziness in orthography whilst abusing the comma splice.

Could you elaborate?

s/, hell/; hell/

LaC said:
s/, hell/; hell/

And I thought Perl was a bit confusing to parse as a scripting language, try parsing it as English when you don't recognize it at first.

It's not necessarily Perl. The regular expression substitution operator s/// is a lot older than Perl.

LaC said:
s/, hell/; hell/

Disagree, semicolon would work here, but comma is just as good.

piespy said:
It's not necessarily Perl. The regular expression substitution operator s/// is a lot older than Perl.

True, but it's most common in Perl, and I don't think it's part of any of the standardized (e.g. POSIX) regex systems.

Is too. Both vi and sed support it, and both are a part of required POSIX utils.