Negative downvoted yet reapproved images.

Whilst looking through the 'what' tag, I've come across post #653774 which has a very low score of -42.

This brings me to a question. Should downvoted yet reapproved images be subjected to another round of moderation considering the large amount of downvotes it has?

hidetheunforgiven said:
Whilst looking through the 'what' tag, I've come across post #653774 which has a very low score of -42.

This brings me to a question. Should downvoted yet reapproved images be subjected to another round of moderation considering the large amount of downvotes it has?

Score has never counted toward the approval process and it's been flagged at least once already.

No matter how low a score something has, it's a slippery slope to say that we can or should keep entering an image we don't like into the moderation queue as often as it takes to get it deleted.

Approver: Seem
I see no reason to even flag bad images for deletion anymore when he just reapproves them and thereby locks the unapprove option. (even when he approved the image the first time or if it was his own upload that got unapproved). You could have those images go through mod queue a hundred times and have him approve it every time.

examples: post #616169, post #602107, post #606709, post #574085, post #744989, post #47668, etc.

Don't start this thread again. Just lock it, nothing productive will come out of it.

It's just going to keep happening again and again every time one more user comes across Seem's approvals and wonders what the hell is going on.

S1eth said: Approver: Seem

Pretty much. I've already made my feelings on this known multiple times so what is done with him is out of my hands at this point.

Which means it's obviously out of the hands of anyone here as well, so as Log says, might as well just lock this.