Donmai

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

SolRush said:

I have been seeing or translating several post commentaries containing only the character's name. Do you think it's a good idea to start a new tag called "Name-only commentary?"

These are the responses I got the last time I brought it up.

Laudividni said:

I don't expect uploaders to know if the commentary is the name of the character or copyright, these can be easily searched and mass translated using the text, that's what I do once in a while with big chartags. Any more commentary tags like that is padding.

ANON_TOKYO said:

While name/title commentary seem useful, it's true that it's basically just tag padding, and will be severely under-tagged as well.

Mavado said:

These are the responses I got the last time I brought it up.

Now that they mention it, how is commentary being used for searching? This is still something to note in the future. If it's easy for one to know the Japanese text is in-fact the character's name, the commentary tag will likely be filled with posts only containing names only. There might be a case where someone wants to search for informal or lengthy commentaries.

DocWatson said:

I'm still looking for an answer to this, please.

what is a cami bra, in your opinion? you might want to create a forum topic about this

i performed a google search to find that cami bras are camisole-like bras. given that cami bra is now a single post tag, i believe it was not being redirected (aliased) to cat_bra, but rather it was the danbooru autocorrect trying to guess if it's not simply a typo for a more common tag

post #8362870 | post #8389368 | post #8611264 | post #8844918

cheating_(relationship) is being added to any image of vulpisfoglia_(arknights) being sexual with anyone other than suzuran's_father_(arknights), and not only cases where the image itself contextualizes and depicts it as cheating. Is that correct use of the tag? Unlike some other tags such as no tail, the cheating tag wiki doesn't make clear whether it applies to "canon" or "what you can see".

Updated

Nell said:

post #8362870 | post #8389368 | post #8611264 | post #8844918

cheating_(relationship) is being added to any image of vulpisfoglia_(arknights) being sexual with anyone other than suzuran's_father_(arknights), and not only cases where the image itself contextualizes and depicts it as cheating. Is that correct use of the tag? Unlike some other tags such as no tail, the cheating tag wiki doesn't make clear whether it applies to "canon" or "what you can see".

This isn't a new thing for this user - I believe they were previously mentioned not to add any of the related cheating tags unless such cheating was actually depicted in the image and not just off of who's there at the current moment. @Changemynameshit Any explanation here?

WRS said:

This isn't a new thing for this user - I believe they were previously mentioned not to add any of the related cheating tags unless such cheating was actually depicted in the image and not just off of who's there at the current moment. @Changemynameshit Any explanation here?

from my pov if any married character had any sexual act with other than her husband is cheating, though if this wrong from this site rule i am sorry.

1 519 520 521 522 523