Donmai

Fire Emblem implications

Posted under Tags

Fenton said:

BUR #34806 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication robin_(female)_(fell_tactician)_(fire_emblem) -> robin_(female)_(fire_emblem)

Female Robin's costume when she gets possessed by Grima.

Why doesn't it imply Grima then? Why are nearly all Grima posts tagged Robin when Grima doesn't imply Robin? It seems like we're missing a tag for "Robin possessed by Grima".

create implication robin_(male)_(fell_reincarnation)_(resplendent)_(fire_emblem) -> robin_(male)_(fire_emblem)

Four qualifiers is terrible. Do we really need both (fell_reincarnation) and (resplendent)?

evazion said:

Four qualifiers is terrible. Do we really need both (fell_reincarnation) and (resplendent)?

Resplendent is necessary because it differentiates the design of the base design of Robin: Fell Reincarnation (post #3028283) from his Resplendent design (post #7548352). Both appearance are of the in-game unit Robin: Fell Reincarnation. It's just that periodically they give older units an additional appearance which is the "resplendent" version.

As for why Robin: Fell Reincarnation doesn't have it's own tag, it's because it's the base appearance of the character and Fell Reincarnation is just the designation used in Fire Emblem Heroes for their base design. Though Lyn seems be an issue regarding this. The base version of Lyn in FEH is Lyn: Lady of the Plains (post #3545709). They had released a resplendent version of her (post #3774253) which is only tagged Lyn (resplendent) (fire_emblem), but they also released a resplendent version of the brave version of Lyn that is tagged Lyn (brave lady) (resplendent) (fire emblem) which could confusingly be tagged Lyn (resplendent) by someone who didn't know any better. Normal brave Lyn is post #2837010, resplendent is post #6093216. [Sidenote, this reinforces my stance that using the common shorts for their titles where possible makes more sense, since if they end up with a resplendent version it'd help to further cut tag length. In short Lyn (brave) instead of Lyn (brave lady)].

Updated

BUR #37342 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias enlightened_byleth_(male) -> byleth_(male)_(enlightened)_(fire_emblem)
create alias enlightened_byleth_(female) -> byleth_(female)_(enlightened)_(fire_emblem)
create implication byleth_(male)_(enlightened)_(fire_emblem) -> byleth_(male)_(fire_emblem)
create implication byleth_(female)_(enlightened)_(fire_emblem) -> byleth_(female)_(fire_emblem)

Bad tag name, I'm making the tag naming to be consistent to their Heroes costume tags. This version also has a light green hair compared to the original's dark green, which could be really hard for people who want to find the Enlightened version of Byleth.

nth_color said:

BUR #37452 has been rejected.

create implication bernadetta_von_varley_(sheltered_loner) -> bernadetta_von_varley
create alias bernadetta_von_varley_(sheltered_loner) -> bernadetta_von_varley_(adult)

This one is weird because this is essentially just Bernadetta's adult self as a playable unit in FEH, if this BUR goes through I'll populate it with older posts with this design.

Could "_(pre-timeskip)" and "_(post_timeskip)" be a good qualifier?

Login_to_view said:

Could "_(pre-timeskip)" and "_(post_timeskip)" be a good qualifier?

Personally I would prefer "_(post_timeskip)" as well since some characters are already 18 or even older (the oldest student, Mercedes, is 22) at the beginning of the game. I'm not sure if we need pre timeskip tags though.

1 2 3 4 5