unwanted exposure is forced exposure

BUR #36699 has been rejected.

create alias unwanted_exposure -> forced_exposure

Both tags cover the same use case from what I can see, forced seems to be more all encompassing.

Forced exposure is more specific IMO, a few of these posts aren't that, they're walk-ins instead. Would it be better to nuke instead, or just untag the posts that don't qualify as forced exposure?

kimonomiko said:

Forced exposure is more specific IMO, a few of these posts aren't that, they're walk-ins instead. Would it be better to nuke instead, or just untag the posts that don't qualify as forced exposure?

I will untag them and add walk in + embarrassed then.

Freshblink said:

I will untag them and add walk in + embarrassed then.

OK, I went and fixed a couple others as well. Sounds good to me now.

Cleared out the tag manually. It was only used by one guy in 2023. Unwanted exposure isn't a good alias because most assisted exposure is unwanted too. In fact I'm not sure what the difference between forced exposure and assisted exposure is given that most "assisted" exposure is against the person's will.

The bulk update request #36699 (forum #335243) has been rejected by @evazion.

BUR #36917 is pending approval.

create implication forced_exposure -> assisted_exposure

As per the former's wiki.

The difference is when there's a willing person in a situation and someone removes an article of clothing for them in a situation for provocative reasons, maybe to a third party. Forced exposure is more focused on embarrassment.

Ok, the wiki did not make that clear.
Pantsing is implied to assisted exposure, but it seems more like forced exposure to me bc of the humilation.