Posted under Tags
BUR #35436 has been approved by @evazion.
mass update favgroup:39580 -> very_big_eyes
nuke big_eyes
Big eyes was deprecated 2 years ago in topic #22215, so I'm proposing this change to clear out the tag. A second pass-through to check if I've hit the right notes would be appreciated or if some posts should be added/removed. Obviously can't do anything about banned posts.
big_eyes -favgroup:39580 status:any for big eyes that won't be updated with very big eyes if this passes.
looking at the tag, i immediately see post #8358941 and post #8620937. are those really that big?
The first one definitely isn't, the second one is dubious depending on who you ask. This isn't about removing posts from very big eyes though; it's about tagging posts in big eyes with very big eyes if they fit the criteria set out by the wiki, then nuking the whole tag (it's deprecated). In other words; this BUR is trying to achieve the end goal of big eyes deprecation which is for it to not be tagged on any posts and adding, if applicable, an alternative.
Current mistags on very big eyes should be removed by hand. I'm not aiming for those here.
The bulk update request #35436 (forum #330207) has been approved by @evazion.
Very big eyes is really no better than big eyes was. Most of it is eyes that aren't that much bigger than usual relative to the art style or time period it was made in.
