clit and pussy

BUR #36294 is pending approval.

create implication clitoris_peek -> pussy_peek
create implication clitoral_hood -> pussy
create implication clitoris -> pussy

According to pussy wiki, this should make sense.

I don't know, if something's drawn at an angle such that all you can see is the protuding clitoris, or everything is covered up except for the clit, I wouldn't tag that as pussy

Lynx190 said:

I don't know, if something's drawn at an angle such that all you can see is the protuding clitoris, or everything is covered up except for the clit, I wouldn't tag that as pussy

That'd sound like exposed clitoris though that tag needs some gardening.

EDIT: after gardening, it seems exposed clitoris is not really needed as a tag.

BUR #36680 has been rejected.

remove implication clitoris_slip -> pussy_peek

A clit slip should be different from a clit peek and so should not be implying pussy peek.

EDIT: I rejected the BUR after learning more about how *_peek tags are used

BUR #36691 has been approved by @evazion.

deprecate exposed_clitoris

clitoris, clitoris peek, clitoris slip or clitoris cutout should be used instead

The bulk update request #36691 (forum #335213) has been approved by @evazion.

Downvoting BUR #36294 is like saying that just the tip of the penis should be tagged penis_tip and not penis, or that just the foreskin should be tagged foreskin but not penis. The clitoris and its hood are literally a part of the vagina; I don't understand all these downvotes.

If you're tagging something, then I think there's an assumption that most of that thing should be visible in the image. Just because something is technically true, doesn't mean it's a good tagging structure for searching.

Obst said:

If you're tagging something, then I think there's an assumption that most of that thing should be visible in the image. Just because something is technically true, doesn't mean it's a good tagging structure for searching.

This is something I generally agree with, but not for NSFW/fetish tags. I'll be very pissed if I end up having to search pussy clitoris clitoral_hood urethra hymen just to search for pussies.

Obst said:

If you're tagging something, then I think there's an assumption that most of that thing should be visible in the image. Just because something is technically true, doesn't mean it's a good tagging structure for searching.

I just don't think that it'd make much sense if you are searching for pussy but something like post #8078804 is excluded.

I'd also argue that clitoris should only be tagged if it is prominent enough in the image or if it's the only part that's shown due to the viewing angle like post #8078804. Otherwise, most pussy post will be tagged with clitoris anyway.

The bulk update request #36680 (forum #335166) has been rejected by @gzb.

BUR #36735 is pending approval.

mass update id:14151 -> labia_majora_slip

This BUR is to see how receptive is the idea of labia majora slip as a tag. It's for posts like post #14151 and post #8828320 where only the labia majora is visible but not the rest of the pussy. Labia slip is already used for exposed labia minora.