Posted under Tags
BUR #34610 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication okina_mask -> noh_mask
shouldn't it go like this? it's a noh mask after all
BUR #34614 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication noh_mask -> mask
Surprised this one doesn't exist yet.
BUR #34615 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication hannya -> noh_mask
Before I forget this one is also specifically a type of Noh mask.
now that i look at the hannya tag, there are actually quite many posts where there's a hannya design but not the mask itself, like post #8380920 (tattoo) or post #7497245 (nail art)... i don't think we want images with mask designs to end up in a tag for actual masks...
how about this: specific noh masks implying noh_mask, but then being tagged with mask on a case-to-case basis?
sinning said:
now that i look at the hannya tag, there are actually quite many posts where there's a hannya design but not the mask itself, like post #8380920 (tattoo) or post #7497245 (nail art)... i don't think we want images with mask designs to end up in a tag for actual masks...
how about this: specific noh masks implying noh_mask, but then being tagged with mask on a case-to-case basis?
I think this would be a better option
BUR #34616 is pending approval.
create implication hyottoko_mask -> noh_mask
create implication hannya -> noh_mask
create implication oni_mask -> noh_mask
create implication okina_mask -> noh_mask
create implication tengu_mask -> noh_mask
this leaves us with fox mask and monkey mask, which seem to be noh masks 99% of the time (in fact, i have yet to find any non-noh posts in those tags, though i didnt look that intensely), but there still is a risk there are some non-noh fox masks hidden somewhere among thousands of kitsunes
i also found kappa_mask but it can't be implied due to its small count
...additionally, is there seriously no tag for the white-skinned creepy woman noh mask? ko-omote, based on our wiki
sinning said:
now that i look at the hannya tag, there are actually quite many posts where there's a hannya design but not the mask itself, like post #8380920 (tattoo) or post #7497245 (nail art)... i don't think we want images with mask designs to end up in a tag for actual masks...
how about this: specific noh masks implying noh_mask, but then being tagged with mask on a case-to-case basis?
Too confusing. This is like saying rose can't imply flower because it could be a tattoo of a rose. I'd rather either make a tag for hannya tattoos or hannya designs, or just accept that mask can include artistic depictions of masks rather than just literal masks.
The bulk update request #34609 (forum #322851) has been rejected by @evazion.
The bulk update request #34610 (forum #322853) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #34614 (forum #322862) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #34615 (forum #322863) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #36077 has been approved by @evazion.
remove implication oni_mask -> mask
remove implication tengu_mask -> mask
Removing these implications before implying noh mask.
The bulk update request #36077 (forum #332834) has been approved by @evazion.
sinning said:
BUR #34616 is pending approval.
create implication hyottoko_mask -> noh_mask
create implication hannya -> noh_mask
create implication oni_mask -> noh_mask
create implication okina_mask -> noh_mask
create implication tengu_mask -> noh_mask
On second thought, I'm not sure whether all of these are Noh masks. Noh is a specific type of theatre, not just any Japanese mask.