Posted under Tags
BUR #35811 has been approved by @evazion.
rename tsuyako_yaotome_(yunamaro) -> yaotome_tsuyako_(yunamaro)
rename mitsuya_asuma_(yunamaro) -> asuma_mitsuya_(yunamaro)
rename enako_haibara -> haibara_enako
rename kurune_shishido -> shishido_kurune
rename satsuki_ouhara -> oohara_satsuki
According to our tagging guideline, Japanese names should be written in the Japanese order. (Order source: post #8398810, post #6472495, post #6764108, post #6961455)
The guideline doesn't say "Japanese names should be written in the Japanese order", it says "Character tags should be the same name and name order that are used in the original source material." Both orders are used in post #8398810, Japanese order when it's written in kanji and western order when it's written in romaji.
It's strange that we use the romanization that official sources use but not the order that official sources use.
mock said:
The guideline doesn't say "Japanese names should be written in the Japanese order", it says "Character tags should be the same name and name order that are used in the original source material." Both orders are used in post #8398810, Japanese order when it's written in kanji and western order when it's written in romaji.
It's strange that we use the romanization that official sources use but not the order that official sources use.
In that example the ones in Western order are clearly translations, and the Japanese ones are the "original" ones.
Yeah, the first two lines of this BUR are right, those romaji names are written in Western order in the example post (post #8398810). i misread and thought it was wrong at first
Updated
...the last line should be "Oohara Satsuki" (post #6961455 says おおはら さつき)
mock said:
It's strange that we use the romanization that official sources use but not the order that official sources use.
If so, we also need to rename many other character tags such as Kaname Madoka, Fujimaru Ritsuka and Gotoh Hitori.
hasu_no_kougeki said:
...the last line should be "Oohara Satsuki" (post #6961455 says おおはら さつき)
Afaik, in many cases, ‘おお-’ is written as ‘oh-’.
(Ohtsuki Yui, Ohishi Izumi, Ohnuma Kurumi, etc.)
AkaringoP said:
Afaik, in many cases, ‘おお-’ is written as ‘oh-’.
(ohtsuki yui, ohishi izumi, ohnuma kurumi, etc.)
In all of those cases, official romanizations exist. Here we only have the furigana to go off of, so 'おお' is written as 'oo'.
The bulk update request #35811 (forum #331724) has been approved by @evazion.
