Posted under General
Could I get some feedback on these three?
post #8631054
post #8631062
post #8631079
I think the 'poor quality' disapprovals are because of the background, it isn't my best work for a background.
But what do all the 'disinterested' disapprovals mean/are for? I don't see any guidelines that outline what 'disinterested' means and when it should be applied. Could someone clarify that for me?
Thank you <33
goldn said:
[...]
it's probably the rather flat coloring/shading and the slightly off perspective that turned away approvers. "disinterest" simply means that an approver reviewed your post but wasn't personally interested in approving it. don't sweat it though, i see potential here and i highly encourage you to keep practicing art!
sacchariine said:
it's probably the rather flat coloring/shading and the slightly off perspective that turned away approvers. "disinterest" simply means that an approver reviewed your post but wasn't personally interested in approving it. don't sweat it though, i see potential here and i highly encourage you to keep practicing art!
ah, thank you! This is really good info and feedback. I'll use it to improve, thank you very much!
Hello administrators/censors, I don't mean to offend danbooru's rules, but could I be allowed to upload these entries? According to the rules, there are no clear criteria for uploading ‘high quality’ content, and unfortunately the approver who approved my posts didn't like the posts I uploaded and they deleted them. I recognise that everyone's like is different and I respect everyone. But sadly, not everyone does. You can take a look at my posts and they should all be allowed to be uploaded: because there are posts just like them and similar to them that have been successfully uploaded! I've already complained about all the posts below, so I'll just have to put them here. Hopefully you can get them in line with the rules and uploaded.
This is the example (not me upload):
post #7469114
post #8610970
Those are my upload but deleted:
post #7469139
post #7480462
post #7470077
post #7469124
catoxsx said:
Hello administrators/censors, I don't mean to offend danbooru's rules, but could I be allowed to upload these entries? According to the rules, there are no clear criteria for uploading ‘high quality’ content, and unfortunately the approver who approved my posts didn't like the posts I uploaded and they deleted them. I recognise that everyone's like is different and I respect everyone. But sadly, not everyone does. You can take a look at my posts and they should all be allowed to be uploaded: because there are posts just like them and similar to them that have been successfully uploaded! I've already complained about all the posts below, so I'll just have to put them here. Hopefully you can get them in line with the rules and uploaded.
Didn't you say the same thing yesterday? It was explained to you by an approver that "approvers approve uploads based on quality, not only rule-abiding." The posts you linked here do not break any rules.
rodriog3 said:
¿what's wrong with this ones?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8597588
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8584074
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8584190
While I can't really comment on the rest, https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8584190 is pretty low quality for NSFW standards. Like the perspective/portions of both their bodies are fairly off and the shading is amateurish.
catoxsx said:
this time is different, not tickling, even not the r18
Tickling and R18 are not against the rules. The posts that had those weren't deleted because of the subject matter. They were deleted because the art quality was bad.
The SFW ones are better looking overall (again, for reasons unrelated to the subject matter) and might have a shot at appeal, though I see you already used them. Though I can say being rude to the approvers in your posted appeal reason definitely did not help your chances. Those posts don't break any rules either, but that is not enough on its own.
catoxsx said:
This is the example (not me upload):
post #7469114
That is your upload. It says so in the uploader field.
I think some of these are worth appealing
post #8494870
post #8451144
post #8451140
post #8145810
post #7702699
post #7702692
post #7716457
post #7863534
Why were these rejected?
post #7420169
post #8603622
post #8612224
post #8622282
post #8607059
post #8610312
post #8581148
post #8596265
post #8579711 Only the expression is different
lotus_flame said:
post #8579711 Only the expression is different
The parent upload is 12 years old. Even though it's okay to upload those, you shouldn't compare 12 year old uploads with today standards. For future uploads you should always check if it's still good enough today.
In this case I wouldn't approve it, but only a few approvers saw it/reacted on it, which is why I appealed it.
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #6309026
post #6309528
Updated
OK... what's the problem with these posts ?
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8439484?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8464571?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8556152?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8558785?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8571320?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8574788?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8578616?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8583780?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8588386?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8593023?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8604296?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen *
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8626155?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3ARhaizen
(* This penultimate image wasn't approved, but has a parent post that WAS approved. I know this image looks similar to the parent post, but ISN'T the same image. So why it wasn't approved ?)
Why were all these posts deleted ? What's wrong ?
Could you, please, to reconsider the deletion of some of these posts ?
Updated
Any quality concerns with post #8597089? Seemed good to me and rated well
post #8596398 (Parent and sibling posts were all approved.)
post #8618302post #8620581 (Official art; currently mid-appeal)
post #8622589post #8625577 (Similar quality to approved works from the same artist)post #8625608 (Same reason as above)
post #8626518post #8627116 (Larger version of post #8623013)
Updated
