imply figure_four_sitting -> crossed_legs

BUR #32668 has been rejected.

create implication figure_four_sitting -> crossed_legs

The legs should be crossing each other in figure four sitting anyway.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #32668 (forum #311744) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Is post #8595507 crossed legs?

nonamethanks said:

Is post #8595507 crossed legs?

According to the wiki definition, it's not figure_four_sitting.

BUR #34731 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication figure_four_sitting -> sitting

it may or may not be crossed legs but its still a form of sitting

The bulk update request #34731 (forum #323409) has been approved by @evazion.

In some cases like post #6437698, post #5252907, or post #7955692 it's borderline whether the person is sitting or reclining on their back, but okay.