Post Ban Request Thread

post #8399945 and post #8399946

Any reason why they aren't banned as paid rewards?

They were free at one point and uploaded during that time before transitioning to a pay wall, which would make those fair game to be uploaded. It's in the commentary that it would be available for free for a week.

WRS said:

They were free at one point and uploaded during that time before transitioning to a pay wall, which would make those fair game to be uploaded. It's in the commentary that it would be available for free for a week.

Welp, should have read the commentary first. Thanks.

post #8534280

Paid reward.

post #8535882
post #8535920

Fanbox reward.

post #8540382

Accidentally added a banned artist tag to this one, from the looks of it. Would like it unbanned.

Ah, thank you!

post #8532544

Banned artist. @Sibyl You could at least start requesting bans on your own if you're going to intentionally remove banned artist and the artist tag during the upload then add it back after it's been posted without ban status, even though you really shouldn't be.

WRS said:

post #8532544

Banned artist. @Sibyl You could at least start requesting bans on your own if you're going to intentionally remove banned artist and the artist tag during the upload then add it back after it's been posted without ban status, even though you really shouldn't be.

I don't care at all whether the post should be banned or not. That's approver+'s business. I only care about whether I have the permission to edit tags.

Sibyl said:

I don't care at all whether the post should be banned or not. That's approver+'s business. I only care about whether I have the permission to edit tags.

It is your business because you can get banned if posts aren't properly banned upon upload.

Sibyl said:

I don't care at all whether the post should be banned or not. That's approver+'s business. I only care about whether I have the permission to edit tags.

Bruh, not caring about posts being properly banned just so it only benefits you?

It is the uploader's responsibility to ensure banned posts are properly banned once they're uploaded; if they can't do so via the upload page, they must request a post ban here. Do not make yourself an exception to this.

Sorry, I'm just a rookie when it comes to tag gardening. I sometimes need to submit tags serveral times to make sure I haven't left behind tags I can think of.

Jisadel said:
only benefits you?

By "benefit" do you mean that I get to edit those posts for a limited time? That’s ridiculous. I'm sure there will be a nice user like WRS to request a ban, or an approver to ban posts when searching for banned_artist.

By the way, is there any rules in the wiki that require all users to request a post ban for banned_artist? I didn't find that.
If there were such a rule, I'd be willing to follow it.

I'm sure there will be a nice user like WRS to request a ban, or an approver to ban posts when searching for banned_artist.

Pretty sure other users should not have to clean up after you, nor are approvers searching banned artist. You yourself need to bring attention to unbanned posts that should be banned in this thread.

Sibyl said:

I don't care at all whether the post should be banned or not. That's approver+'s business. I only care about whether I have the permission to edit tags.

Wrong.
It's your duty to tag and archive posts accordingly.
Finish tagging before submitting.

Also don't make your incompetence in tagging the approver's problem.

Sibyl said:

I don't care at all whether the post should be banned or not. That's approver+'s business. I only care about whether I have the permission to edit tags.

As much as I care about having edit permissions too, you gotta do it by the book. Not doing so jeopardizes the site's continued existence.

post #8547859
post #8547858
another two Sibyl uploads of banned artist