The bulk update request #33883 (forum #319929) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #33883 (forum #319929) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33890 (forum #319958) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33900 (forum #320005) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33917 (forum #320052) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33928 (forum #320089) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #33954 (forum #320248) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Ylimegirl said:
BUR #34007 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Show
create alias elizabeth_bathory_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate/extra_ccc)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(jurassic_dream)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(el_presidente)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(joint_recital)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(corroded)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(sweet_room_dream)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(beach_bloody_demoness)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(dragon_magician_girl)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(cheerleader)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(idol's_sleep_wear)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(dark_eliza)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)elly-chan
@Ylimegirl this is wrong, the fate/extra CCC tag says it's for the outfit from that game. We shouldn't be dumping everything under it. elizabeth bathory (first ascension) (fate) appears to be the same as elizabeth_bathory_(fate/extra_ccc), they should be aliased and the rest just implied to the main tag.
The bulk update request #34031 (forum #320426) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #34033 (forum #320430) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #34035 (forum #320432) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #34036 (forum #320434) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #34038 (forum #320438) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #34043 (forum #320454) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32680 (forum #311795) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32691 (forum #311811) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32698 (forum #311819) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32701 (forum #311829) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Ylimegirl said:
BUR #32735 has been rejected.
create implication barghest_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> barghest_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate)
remove implication barghest_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> barghest_(fate)Barg implication. The name of the exhibition attire CE says "UDK-Barghest", indicating it's her swimsuit archer version.
This doesn't really matter to us. What matters is if there's something common visually that ties them together. In this case I can't see anything that would suggest we should have 2 layers of implications.
The bulk update request #32735 (forum #311936) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #32841 (forum #312369) has been approved by @nonamethanks.