Posted under Tags
We all know that the stomach bulge and cervical penetration are more or less impossible IRL (at least, their respective wiki pages say so), but what about nipple penetration? Asking this to add more information to the wiki page, as I feel that it's not enough.
aimuahanhk said:
I just wanna know if that is impossible or not so that I know whether I should write "This is impossible in real life" or just leave the wiki page as it is.
Usually information not useful to tagging shouldn't be added. Something being possible or not IRL is not useful information.
Login_to_view said:
Usually information not useful to tagging shouldn't be added. Something being possible or not IRL is not useful information.
Well, tell that to those who wrote the wiki pages of cervical penetration and stomach bulge respectively.
feline_lump said:
The existing disclaimers correct popular misconceptions, so I believe there's value in having them there. Adding disclaimers to random articles just for the sake of lengthening them isn't all that productive, though.
To be fair, I wouldn't entirely argue the idea that nipples just have a singular hole in them, akin to another potential orifice, isn't a popular misconception. A least among coomers.
aimuahanhk said:
Well, tell that to those who wrote the wiki pages of cervical penetration and stomach bulge respectively.
The cervical penetration wiki says:
Almost impossible to perform and would be excruciatingly painful in reality.
The "almost" makes it sound like there are known real life examples of this...
Well considering IUDs are a thing it IS possible to push something solid into the cervix as opposed to things only goin the other way (babies) but as someone with a cervix I don't even want to imagine what something penis sized going into it would feel like.
Login_to_view said:
Usually information not useful to tagging shouldn't be added. Something being possible or not IRL is not useful information.
evvvk said:
I am not really sure if Danbooru's wiki needs to be the place that specializes in determining whether niche 2D porn fetishes are actually possible IRL or not.
feline_lump said:
The existing disclaimers correct popular misconceptions, so I believe there's value in having them there. Adding disclaimers to random articles just for the sake of lengthening them isn't all that productive, though.
Yeah these are short and fluid sentences or whatever it's called in english, they belong in the wiki.
blindVigil said:
To be fair, I wouldn't entirely argue the idea that nipples just have a singular hole in them, akin to another potential orifice, isn't a popular misconception. A least among coomers.
Add this instead.
