John_Doubloon said:
I appreciate you tagging me. I believe that separating the ocean sunfish and the freshwater sunfish in their own tags would be better as they are both very different from each other. I support your second BUR but I would keep sunfish as an alias to mola_(fish) because when people think of sunfish, they would usually think of the ocean sunfish. Creating a tag for freshwater sunfish separate from sunfish seems like a good idea and it could look something like sunfish_(freshwater).
I see that I have tagged post #3599374 mistakenly. The closest fish I had in mind was tilapia, which is a type of cichilid that is native to Africa but it looks too different from regular tilapia. So, leaving it just tagged as fish would do.
Of course, it often seems silly when this site makes assumptions on user tagging instead of just... well, asking them. It seems a lot of drama here is caused by that. Initially I did not have a prefference for whether we went with mola_(fish) or ocean_sunfish but wikipedia has some conflicting info on wether "ocean sunfish" refers to all species of mola or just mola mola. The wikipedia for the genus starts of with this:
A sunfish, also called a mola, is any fish in the genus Mola (family Molidae).
Then has this weird bit at the bottom.
Species
There are currently 3 recognized extant species in this genus:[5][6]
Mola mola (Linnaeus, 1758) (Ocean sunfish)
Mola alexandrini (Giglioli, 1883) (Southern sunfish)
Mola tecta Nyegaard et al., 2017 (Hoodwinker sunfish)
†Mola pileata (extinct), Upper Miocene to Middle miocene
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mola_(fish)
So my best guess is it's both. "mola_(fish)" is also the tag used on e621.net (and as I saw while writing this, in the wiki url) so that's greater cross site compatibility when it gets scraped but on the other hand I seemingly only see people reffering to them as mola molas (regardless of species) or ocean sunfishes in speech.