Donmai

Add gendered spanking (BUR)

Posted under Tags

BUR #31073 has been rejected.

mass update favgroup:35542 -> M/M_Spanking
mass update favgroup:35541 -> F/M_Spanking
mass update favgroup:35540 -> F/F_Spanking
mass update favgroup:35539 -> M/F_Spanking

Per NNT's explanation on discord, I am providing example favgroups for new tags. These groups do not have all instances tagged already, however if this BUR is approved I will tag garden all spanking tag images myself if necessary.

Goal: I would like to add gendered spanking to tags, for example f/f span..., m/f span..., f/m span..., m/m span...

Reasoning: For those into spanking, F/F vs M/M etc have very different desirability depending on person. There is utility to being able to filter by these categories (or subcategories) if you're looking for a specific dynamic.

Why current tagging is inadequate: Current tags cannot encompass what these tags cover and here are some examples.

1. F/M, you can search (femdom, 1girl, 1boy) which is a gold+ search and it still filters situations with more than 1girl and its F/M. Adding 2 girls runs the risk of cross contamination where 1 girl spanks another girl and the boy is watching. Example: 8064917

2. F/F, you can search (femdom, 2girls, multiple_girls) which is a gold+ search, but it filters scenarios where there are boys present who are not involved in the spanking. Example: 7865616

3. M/F In some scenarios a male could be spanking a male in a non yaoi situation while a girl watches. Example: 4583496

As current tags cannot perfectly filter for all desired images, this proposal in my opinion is helpful.

In addition I want to note precedent with tags like:

MMF threesome
FFM threesome
MMM threesome
FFF threesome

Updated

Very good idea. I personally don't like the new tag names—maybe spell out m/f and use spaces or hyphens. I also think the gender of who is getting spanked is much more valuable than who's spanking, so maybe shorten it to two tags. (I never search for spanking personally)

Some might also find f/m ambiguous instead of it being obviously "f on m" and not "m on f"

LQ said:

I personally don't like the new tag names as there aren't any existing tags with the m/m convention (maybe spell it out and use spaces or hyphens), and I only care about the gender of who is getting spanked and not of who is spanking. (But I never search for spanking anyway.)

Other than that, it seems like a very good idea.

Well we can agree if BUR is approved, to change F/M spanking to say Female_on_male_spanking instead. I agree that's a more reasonable name and I would be fine with that change. Same for all the other tags.

Also gender of spanked and spanking person both matter for those into this fetish (my 2 cents).

Updated

BUR #31080 has been rejected.

mass update favgroup:35539 -> male_spanking_female
mass update favgroup:35542 -> male_spanking_male
mass update favgroup:35541 -> female_spanking_male
mass update favgroup:35540 -> female_spanking_female

Now, this is going to be a long one, so bear with me here.

Just because tags like mmf_threesome have the letters M and F in them doesn't mean they work well as precedents to the proposed tags. In fact, I would argue they're actually a good reason not to use the suggested names. The various threesome subtags make no implication over who is taking the initiative, just that there's at least two x and one y gendered character in the post. Because they've been around for years already, people are going to look at a tag called m/f_spanking and assume it's for "spanking between one boy and one girl", regardless of who's actually dishing them out. The tags, if they are to be created, should be male_spanking_female, male_spanking_male, female_spanking_male and female_spanking_female.

As for whether they should be created, however, I don't know. We need to consider that it opens up the floodgates for users to create up to four (or maybe even more) different gendered tags for all sorts of other stuff, which is something I can see some arguments both for and against (even though I'm leaning toward "yes" after writing this post). Do we really want male_fingering_female, female_pegging_female, female_licking_male_nipple, male_grabbing_male_ass and so on? A lot of those concepts are already very easy to search for, to the point where a tag for them would be nothing but superfluous. male_grabbing_male_ass, for example, is literally just a grabbing_another's_ass yaoi search. female_grabbing_female_ass? You guessed it, grabbing_another's_ass yuri.

On the other, ass-free hand, however, the more you think about it the more you realise that some of these are actually a pain in the afore-mentioned ass to find without tags for them. Consider the following: guys who like girls' fingers up their ass and guys who like to stick their fingers up girls' asses are both delegated to the same searches, despite these two fetishes being very different (1boy 1girl anal_fingering, hetero anal_fingering for blue users, and so on). From the quick scrolling I did, there's about one "male being fingered" post for every two "female being fingered" posts, meaning both parties are subjected to many unfilterable false positives. Tags like male_fingering_female and female_fingering_male are essentially necessary to make both these groups of users happy.

As for another example, if you want posts where a girl is grabbing a guy's ass, you're even more shit out of luck - grabbing_another's_ass is 99% the other way around. If you're an alcoholic, then try taking a shot every time you find man ass being grabbed in the grabbing_another's_ass hetero search. You'll be out of rehab in a week. Also, if you thought about being clever and doing a grabbing_another's_ass femdom search, then think again, bucko. femdom can be tagged on yuri posts, meaning you'd actually need grabbing_another's_ass femdom hetero, but even that search is a mixed bag, containing stuff like post #1568051 and post #1469778. Overall, I feel like this example is actually worse, because female_grabbing_male_ass is all but unsearchable without a tag for it.

When I mentioned this BUR opening the floodgates, what I was referring to is that even if we agree that we only need male_fingering_female and female_fingering_male, and that we don't need male_fingering_male or female_fingering_female, you have to remember that a decent chunk of our users don't like to think too hard about things. They're just going to see the two approved tags while browsing and assume that they should also be using the other two, even though we deemed them unnecessary. We'd have to approach each fetish on a case-by-case basis, determining which of those tags we do or don't need (if any) and then deprecating the superfluous ones (if any) in advance. Now, I personally don't mind this approach, but it absolutely needs to be put to a vote.

tl;dr: Consider this second BUR a vote not just on these individual spanking tags, but on whether we want to give the green light to making such tags for any other fetishes where some or all cases are unsearchable without them.

AngryZapdos said:

Counterpoint: For female-on-male anal_fingering and anilingus, male_penetrated hetero alongside those tags is a good substitute.
Counter-counterpoint: Posts like post #6238074 might show up. And blue users can't search the combination of those three tags. Unless the tag search limit for blues is increased, which I think is something long long overdue at this point.

By the way male_penetrated didn't exist until 2022, but then deprecated by a yuri-obsessed approver who hated males so much he used a script to downvote 50000 male_focus posts and undeprecated years later.

bussinessinformatics said:

By the way male_penetrated didn't exist until 2022, but then deprecated by a yuri-obsessed approver who hated males so much he used a script to downvote 50000 male_focus posts and undeprecated years later.

I can't really speak for that approver's motives, but the tag was originally created by a blue user that got very quickly banned for adding a bunch of "nonsense tags" to posts and only ever added male penetrated to like four posts, so I'm sure deprecating the tag seemed reasonable at the time.

I also don't think it's very relevant to the current topic.

For myself, I'm not against the BUR per se, and I think there's a lot of concepts that could benefit from gendered granularity, I'm just not sure I want to open that can of worms for all the same reasons AngryZapdos pointed out. Bestiality is an example of one, as it covers both https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8043771 and https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7990871 with no way to distinguish between the two. Given it's already a highly divisive fetish, I can't imagine people looking for one will be very happy to see the other, and the latter example is harder to find due to being generally rarer.

Updated

blindVigil said:

I can't really speak for that approver's motives, but the tag was originally created by a blue user that got very quickly banned for adding a bunch of "nonsense tags" to posts and only ever added male penetrated to like four posts, so I'm sure deprecating the tag seemed reasonable at the time.

I also don't think it's very relevant to the current topic.

For myself, I'm not against the BUR per se, and I think there's a lot of concepts that could benefit from gendered granularity, I'm just not sure I want to open that can of worms for all the same reasons AngryZapdos pointed out. Bestiality is an example of one, as it covers both https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8043771 and https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7990871 with no way to distinguish between the two. Given it's already a highly divisive fetish, I can't imagine people looking for one will be very happy to see the other, and the latter example is harder to find due to being generally rarer.

If you want to see the former but not the latter you can just filter out pokephilia

blindVigil said:

Bestiality is an example of one, as it covers both https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8043771 and https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7990871 with no way to distinguish between the two. Given it's already a highly divisive fetish, I can't imagine people looking for one will be very happy to see the other, and the latter example is harder to find due to being generally rarer.

Having uploaded a number of the latter posts myself (I assure you, it's only because I find them funny), I've actually given this some thought before, and I'd been meaning to make a proposal to fix it for a while now. Thanks for the reminder; check out topic #28791 for that discussion, so we don't derail this one.

AngryZapdos said:
femdom can be tagged on yuri posts, meaning you'd actually need grabbing_another's_ass femdom hetero,

I don't know the sites official consensus on this, but I personally don't think femdom should be tagged on yuri posts. One of the females dominating is just kind of inherent.

To me this whole thread sounds like someone with a highly specific fetish getting mad that there are things appearing in their tag that they personally don't like. How are any of these new tags different from a simple spanking hetero -femdom, spanking femdom, spanking yuri, and spanking yaoi search?

sabisabi said:

To me this whole thread sounds like someone with a highly specific fetish getting mad that there are things appearing in their tag that they personally don't like. How are any of these new tags different from a simple spanking hetero -femdom, spanking femdom, spanking yuri, and spanking yaoi search?

Spanking is one of those fetishes where it's often depicted as a genuine punishment for the character rather than something sexual, meaning tags like hetero or yuri often don't apply.

sabisabi said:

I don't know the sites official consensus on this, but I personally don't think femdom should be tagged on yuri posts. One of the females dominating is just kind of inherent.

This makes it sound like https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8040575 is the only kind of sexual encounter that can occur between two women. That's obviously not the case. https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8133573 is not femdom in the same way https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8071197 isn't just because the female partner is the one taking the lead.

blindVigil said:

This makes it sound like https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8040575 is the only kind of sexual encounter that can occur between two women. That's obviously not the case. https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8133573 is not femdom in the same way https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8071197 isn't just because the female partner is the one taking the lead.

Besides that, obviously not every lesbian scene is going to have a dominant anyway. If 2 girls are naked and making out while both are standing upright, where's the femdom.

blindVigil said:

This makes it sound like https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8040575 is the only kind of sexual encounter that can occur between two women. That's obviously not the case. https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8133573 is not femdom in the same way https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8071197 isn't just because the female partner is the one taking the lead.

That doesn't really make sense to me. You can always simply tag post #8040575 with BDSM. Isn't the whole point of femdom women dominating *men*?

1