FGO requests

BUR #32684 is pending approval.

create implication anastasia_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(fgo_fes._2018)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> anastasia_(swimsuit_archer)_(fate)
create implication anastasia_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> anastasia_(fate)

Anastasia implications. FGO News site specifies the dream portrait to be her swimsuit archer version.

BUR #32685 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication andromeda_(exhibition_attire)_(fate) -> andromeda_(fate)

andromedy

BUR #32686 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication angra_mainyu_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> angra_mainyu_(fate)

mango

BUR #32687 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

yuri pirates

BUR #32688 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication antonio_salieri_(kyomaf_2024)_(fate) -> antonio_salieri_(fate)

Missing Salieri implication

BUR #32689 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

rename aozaki_touko_(grand_puppeteer)_(fate) -> aozaki_touko_(grand_puppeteer)
create implication aozaki_touko_(grand_puppeteer) -> aozaki_touko

Missing Touko implication. Removing Fate wualifier qualifier since its not in the main tag.

BUR #32690 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication arash_(fgo_fes._2019)_(fate) -> arash_(fate)
create implication arash_(golden_wings)_(fate) -> arash_(fate)
create implication arash_(noisy_obsession)_(fate) -> arash_(fate)

stella

BUR #32691 is pending approval.

Unlimited implication works

BUR #32692 has been rejected.

create implication emiya_alter -> archer_(fate)

Can see this one go either way wrt approval or disapproval, so submitting it separately.

I need to read the wiki pages first next time.

The bulk update request #32692 (forum #311812) has been rejected by @Ylimegirl.

BUR #32693 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication arjuna_alter_(blue_illusion)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)
create implication arjuna_alter_(festival_outfit)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)
create implication arjuna_alter_(red_box)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)
create implication arjuna_alter_(student_council_president)_(fate) -> arjuna_alter_(fate)

Junao implications

BUR #32694 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication arjuna_(blue_illusion)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(chaldea_park_caravan)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(curry_x_rice)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(fire_god's_brace)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(fondant_au_chocolat)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(pakocure)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)
create implication arjuna_(versus)_(fate) -> arjuna_(fate)

Arjuna implications

BUR #32695 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication artemis_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> artemis_(fate)

Artemis implication

BUR #32696 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication arthur_pendragon_(cafe_camelot)_(fate) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
create implication arthur_pendragon_(fgo_fes._2018)_(fate) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
create implication arthur_pendragon_(star_of_camelot)_(fate) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)
create implication arthur_pendragon_(winter_party)_(fate) -> arthur_pendragon_(fate)

Proto Arthur implications.

BUR #32697 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication artoria_caster_(concept_dress)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate)

Missing Castoria implication.

BUR #32698 is pending approval.

create alias artoria_caster_(swimsuit)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate)
create alias artoria_caster_(swimsuit)_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(swimsuit_berserker)_(first_ascension)_(fate)
create alias artoria_caster_(swimsuit)_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(swimsuit_berserker)_(second_ascension)_(fate)
create alias artoria_caster_(swimsuit)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(swimsuit_berserker)_(third_ascension)_(fate)

Moving swimsuit castoria tags to be consistent with other swimsuit servant tags.

So the wiki says that the 1st ascension for Artoria Pendragon (Swimsuit Ruler) isn't tagged because it's considered her default… but there are 1.2k posts in that tag anyways. Should we deprecate the tag, alias the tag, or imply the tag?

BUR #32701 is pending approval.

create alias artoria_pendragon_(bloom_in_spring)_(fate) -> saber_(bloom_in_spring)_(fate)
create implication saber_(bloom_in_spring)_(fate) -> saber_(fate)

Consistency + implication.

Ylimegirl said:

So the wiki says that the 1st ascension for Artoria Pendragon (Swimsuit Ruler) isn't tagged because it's considered her default… but there are 1.2k posts in that tag anyways. Should we deprecate the tag, alias the tag, or imply the tag?

I would chalk that part in the wiki to being outdated considering the countless other swimsuit tags that do not follow that rule. Personally I would imply the tag since that's the option that makes the most sense.

BUR #32711 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication artoria_pendragon_(swimsuit_ruler)_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(swimsuit_ruler)_(fate)

Per previous messages.