BUR #31383 has been rejected.
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron
Found a duplicate tag for this character. The latter is much more used.
Posted under Tags
BUR #31383 has been rejected.
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron
Found a duplicate tag for this character. The latter is much more used.
the_baron is far too generic. It needs a qualifier, like the_baron_(ghibli) (since the wiki mentions he's in more than one movie).
BUR #31397 has been rejected.
rename the_baron -> the_baron_(ghibli)
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron_(ghibli)
How about this?
The bulk update request #31383 (forum #306939) has been rejected by @Trouble_Windows.
BUR #33089 has been rejected.
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron
This BUR just merges the 2 tags for the baron, without the unnecessary name change. (edit: this is the same BUR that Trouble Windows has proposed then withdrawn)
Updated
It is a resubmitted BUR that was green when the submitter themself closed it for whatever reason. Also it has a reasoning: it strictly improves on the current situation. Also there isn't such a criteria that one can only open a BUR that hasn't been opened and closed by someone before.
Calling it a "just the exact same BUR as the originally rejected one" is a weird choice of words. I do not appreciate it.
> rejected one
That's not true. I wouldn't even say that this is technically true. danbooru claiming it to be 'rejected' is a bug. It hasn't been rejected by anyone that had the right to approve it. It had been *withdrawn*.
> It's not any less generic if you resubmit it a month later.
I didn't write anything that would imply this. I don't think that resubmitting would make it less generic, and didn't write my stuff in this mindset. In fact, I wrote the opposite: I addressed the problem, and I deemed the name change "unnecessary".
In conclusion you just came here, and only lied about what I wrote. I don't like it. If lying about my post, bending it, trying to make me look worse wasn't your intention, please edit your previous post and apologize. Thank you.
Updated
I'm not really sure why you're mad. I'm just pointing out that you're unnecessarily resubmitting the same BUR without adding any more value to the conversation such as why you think "The Baron" isn't generic and doesn't warrant a qualifier which was discussed in the initial chain of replies.
When your BUR just contains the same single line as the original one, it still is just resubmitting the same BUR. I'm not saying you can't resubmit it, I'm saying it's pointless to do for this case and you should probably think about why, from the given context above, it was rejected.
reg_panda said:
BUR #33089 has been rejected.
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron
This BUR just merges the 2 tags for the baron, without the unnecessary name change. (edit: this is the same BUR that Trouble Windows has proposed then withdrawn)
Dude, I rejected it because The Baron is ambiguous. I also already addressed your previous concern, changing it to The Baron (Ghibli). This is old man yelling at cloud behavior.
Updated
There should probably be a distinction between "rejected by third party" (other user, danbooru bot) and "rejected by original poster" (which is what happened here, and reg panda referred to as being "withdrawn").
Either way, The Baron by itself is ambiguous enough to warrant a qualifier. Hence why the second BUR was added.
Ylimegirl said:
There should probably be a distinction between "rejected by third party" (other user, danbooru bot) and "rejected by original poster" (which is what happened here, and reg panda referred to as being "withdrawn").
There is just not in the main message
DanbooruBot said:
The bulk update request #31383 (forum #306939) has been rejected by @Trouble_Windows.
Anyway this is a non-issue. The Baron (Ghibli) works just fine.
The bulk update request #31397 (forum #307012) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
BUR #33240 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename the_baron -> the_baron_(mimi_wo_sumaseba)
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron_(mimi_wo_sumaseba)
Sorry, it looks like all the requests with qualifiers got rejected. Throwing another one into the grinder. I think the Ghibli qualifier is weird because the movies are manga adaptations, not Ghibli originals, so you get a Whisper of the Heart qualifier.
heartattack said:
BUR #33240 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename the_baron -> the_baron_(mimi_wo_sumaseba)
create alias baron_humbert_von_gikkingen -> the_baron_(mimi_wo_sumaseba)Sorry, it looks like all the requests with qualifiers got rejected. Throwing another one into the grinder. I think the Ghibli qualifier is weird because the movies are manga adaptations, not Ghibli originals, so you get a Whisper of the Heart qualifier.
Huh, the more you know.