The_Bob said:
A boombox is a portable stereo system. A stereo system is any hardware that uses two or more speakers to play sound with a 3-dimensional effect. A speaker is a component of a stereo system, but can also be used in non-stereo systems.
Posted under General
The_Bob said:
A boombox is a portable stereo system. A stereo system is any hardware that uses two or more speakers to play sound with a 3-dimensional effect. A speaker is a component of a stereo system, but can also be used in non-stereo systems.
Name connection wiki says that name connection is between 2 characters, and for character and object, use object namesake.
But object namesake implies name connection. The wiki should be changed, or the implication removed
reg_panda said:
Name connection wiki says that name connection is between 2 characters, and for character and object, use object namesake.
But object namesake implies name connection. The wiki should be changed, or the implication removed
Just created a BUR for this to be discussed in topic #27615.
I assume it applies when the midriff is visible, and there is no navel. I think the first sentence tries to say this, but it is indeed unclear.
Then it talks about when it should or shouldn't be tagged as artistic_error as well.
help:image_source is not saying anything about faking sources based on SauceNao (for pixiv) or archive.org. E.g. in topic #27723 it is told to people that they should modify the source field to pixiv based on saucenao, even if they got the picture from elsewhere. If it is the current practice, then help:image_source should be updated.
I am not sure about handbag and shoulder_bag. For example, if a woman purse carried on the shoulder, like post #7767942 should be tagged both? But in general, their wiki don't mention their relation.
I've updated howto:tag to match help:upload better, in regards of minimal tagging requirements. I am not sure, why it got reverted?
current: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/howto:tag#dtext-minimal-tagging-criteria
my version: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_page_versions/587851#dtext-minimal-tagging-criteria
help:upload: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/help:upload#dtext-minimal-tagging-criteria
especially that howto:tag is what is referred about minimum tagging requirements, as in forum #289625
reg_panda said:
I've updated howto:tag to match help:upload better, in regards of minimal tagging requirements. I am not sure, why it got reverted?
current: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/howto:tag#dtext-minimal-tagging-criteria
my version: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_page_versions/587851#dtext-minimal-tagging-criteria
help:upload: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/help:upload#dtext-minimal-tagging-criteriaespecially that howto:tag is what is referred about minimum tagging requirements, as in forum #289625
I don't think it's unreasonable to want the minimal tagging criteria list to include general tags, but it would've been better to do so in a way that didn't involve repeating information from that page or changing the formatting. I think adding a single "general tags" item matching the list's format would've been sufficient and would lead nicely into the next section, which describes general tags in more detail.
More importantly, editing a help wiki page without asking is not a good idea. With that in mind, please don't try to add my suggestion to the wiki. Let someone else higher up handle it if they think it'll be a good addition.
I don't think it's unreasonable to want the minimal tagging criteria list to include general tags
I didn't intend to change the policy. They suggested that it is the current policy (therefore the howto:tag wiki, as it is, is simply wrong), and the help:upload wiki page (which is locked from me, so it must be it is stronger) agrees with that.
I think the formatting is broken. (edit: no, that's not right, a single whitespace should fix it, no need to change it at all. Then i don't know why did I change the formatting. Probably I've missed this fix, and I've decided to match the other list better.)
So I fixed it, but it got reverted. I still think my version is better, and I'd like to revert the revert. I think I should ask @岩戸鈴芽 first, why did you revert it?
Updated
reg_panda said:
I didn't intend to change the policy. They suggested that it is the current policy (therefore the howto:tag wiki, as it is, is simply wrong), and the help:upload wiki page (which is locked from me, so it must be it is stronger) agrees with that.
I think the formatting is broken.(edit: no, that's not right, a single whitespace should fix it, no need to change it at all. Then i don't know why did I change the formatting. Probably I've missed this fix, and I've decided to match the other list better.)So I fixed it, but it got reverted. I still think my version is better, and I'd like to revert the revert. I think I should ask @岩戸鈴芽 first, why did you revert it?
It's unnecessary, since there's already a section about general tags. It's not an exhaustive list, it never was, and nobody ever (correctly) implied that it is, even though that's how you seem to be interpreting it.
It also made no sense to have under the "Minimal Tagging Criteria" header. If the wiki were to include that list, it'd be under the list of general tags. I'm not here to clean up your shit, so I reverted it.
puffy pants (2.5k posts)
like what separates this from baggy pants..
c_spl said:
puffy pants (2.5k posts)
like what separates this from baggy pants..
At a glance it seems to be that they're tucked in or cinched at the ankles to create a bulbous effect, instead of being merely wide-cut like post #7835022. Not sure if it's worth keeping though.
Two wikis currently contradict each other.
Ass support wiki says:
Think of breast lift for the ass, but without the hard requirement of the character lifting their own ass.
Breast lift wiki says:
Breasts being pushed up or held up by one's or another's own hands.
Blank_User said:
Two wikis currently contradict each other.
What's the contradiction? It sounds like the wiki for ass support is more or less saying it's "the butt being pushed up or held up, but not limited to being held up by one's own hands." The tag is essentially doing for the ass tag what both breast_lift and breast_rest do for the breasts tag.
At the time this line was added to ass_support in 2021, the breast_lift wiki stated it was for one holding up their own breasts. The current wording including someone else holding them up didn't exist until this year.
GreyOmega said:
At the time this line was added to ass_support in 2021, the breast_lift wiki stated it was for one holding up their own breasts. The current wording including someone else holding them up didn't exist until this year.
Yes, that's the contradiction. The ass support wiki makes it sound like breast lift can't be used when someone else is lifting the breasts, but the breast lift wiki says it can.
I tried to fix that, but now ass support is self-contradictory. It says that only support by hand counts, but on the example picture they use a bar for it. I give up. edit: ass support looks nice now. That image grid with captions looks so nice
What do you think about husband and wife, should they be "married" as "married", or is it enough if they are old, live together, have kids and such like in post #7824395? (edit: unless them married is canon/spoiler)
Updated