Posted under Tags
caps7 said:
Shouldn't this imply elysia (miss pink elf) (honkai impact) instead, since it's a costume for that specific battlesuit?
It should, will make the correction. Conveniently slipped me for Elysia having multiple battlesuits that I implied it directly instead but conveniently managed to get it right for the rest of the battlesuits. Appreciate it fella.
The bulk update request #27145 (forum #284050) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #27804 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication kiana_kaslana_(time_runner) -> kiana_kaslana_(herrscher_of_flamescion)
create implication kiana_kaslana_(flowering_luminance) -> kiana_kaslana_(herrscher_of_flamescion)
Official Flamescion outfits
Edit: Added qualifiers to outfits as per suggestion
Updated
xcv450 said:
BUR #27804 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication kiana_kaslana_(time_runner) -> kiana_kaslana_(herrscher_of_flamescion)
create implication kiana_kaslana_(flowering_luminance) -> kiana_kaslana_(herrscher_of_flamescion)Official Flamescion outfits
@xcv450 The outfits should have "_(honkai_impact)" qualifiers; see discussion from forum #281315. Time we get these Honkai Impact 3rd tags some consistency.
This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.
The bulk update request #26387 (forum #281153) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.
The bulk update request #26474 (forum #281496) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
BUR #28247 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias fenrisulfr_(benghuai_xueyuan) -> fenrir_(benghuai_xueyuan)
Same character.
BUR #28398 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(honkai_impact)
create implication elysia_(summer_miss_elf)_(honkai_impact) -> elysia_(miss_pink_elf)_(honkai_impact)
create implication elysia_(miss_pink)_(honkai_impact) -> elysia_(miss_pink_elf)_(honkai_impact)
rename eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(flowing_rhyme)_(honkai_impact)
official outfits from those characters
elysialover said:
BUR #28398 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(honkai_impact)
create implication elysia_(summer_miss_elf)_(honkai_impact) -> elysia_(miss_pink_elf)_(honkai_impact)
create implication elysia_(miss_pink)_(honkai_impact) -> elysia_(miss_pink_elf)_(honkai_impact)
rename eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(flowing_rhyme)_(honkai_impact)official outfits from those characters
FWIW: already attempted to imply Summer Miss Elf (forum #284749) but getting HI3/GGZ BURs approved isn't easy (see how many have been auto-rejected). It's obviously not ease since NNT needs to make sure they're correct but these ones take longer to get noticed. If NNT goes on one of his BUR runs and finally approves the aforementioned one then Elysia (Summer Miss Elf) will already be implied.
These BURs are a mess to approve because they often end up creating deeply nested tag relationships, which we want to avoid unless it's strictly unavoidable. Whenever I look at HI3 tags I end up in a rabbit hole that takes away hours of my time because there's always something else to fix, so they're typically at the bottom of my priority list.
Another thing: some tags have extra qualifiers that are not needed. bianka_durandal_ataegina_(nibelungen_traumlied)_(honkai_impact) should not have the honkai impact qualifier, because the parent tag doesn't have it and is not ambiguous with anything. These tags are already ridiculously long, they don't need to be longer.
The bulk update request #27804 (forum #286582) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
xcv450 said:
BUR #27804 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication kiana_kaslana_(time_runner) -> kiana_kaslana_(herrscher_of_flamescion)
create implication kiana_kaslana_(flowering_luminance) -> kiana_kaslana_(herrscher_of_flamescion)Official Flamescion outfits
Edit: Added qualifiers to outfits as per suggestion
Removed the qualifiers.
The bulk update request #28247 (forum #291463) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
elysialover said:
BUR #28398 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(honkai_impact)
create implication elysia_(summer_miss_elf)_(honkai_impact) -> elysia_(miss_pink_elf)_(honkai_impact)
create implication elysia_(miss_pink)_(honkai_impact) -> elysia_(miss_pink_elf)_(honkai_impact)
rename eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(flowing_rhyme)_(honkai_impact)official outfits from those characters
Added rename eden_(flowing_rhyme) -> eden_(flowing_rhyme)_(honkai_impact)
You guys should really be more consistent with qualifiers and align them to their umbrella tags.
The bulk update request #28398 (forum #292186) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
WeakestResUser said:
Perception is stated to be "1/5" of Ajita. Perception as a fragment or alternate form of Ajita has a significant enough story and material presence alongside Songque and the rest of the cast to become a subordinate character tag. Perception can, for example, be seen with Songque in post #7596910 whereas Ajita herself as a whole is the leftmost shadowed figure in post #7241949.
This is another reason why these topics are low priority. Whenever I see an implication and go to figure out what it's for I have to read some regurgitated lore dump that sounds like schizo ravings to anyone who's never touched the game.
The bulk update request #26925 (forum #283375) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
