Donmai

New flower implications.

Posted under Tags

Mango2 said:

BUR #26542 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication amaryllis_(flower) -> flower
create implication aqua_flower -> flower
create implication azalea_(flower) -> flower
create implication bougainvillea_(flower) -> flower
create implication brown_flower -> flower
create implication crocus_(flower) -> flower
create implication elpis_flower -> flower
create implication freesia_(flower) -> flower
create implication gentiana_(flower) -> flower
create implication hanging_flower -> flower
create implication mimosa_(flower) -> flower
create implication multicolored_flower -> flower
create implication oversized_flower -> flower
create implication primrose_(flower) -> flower
create implication qingxin_flower -> flower
create implication snowbell_(flower) -> flower
create implication water_lily_flower -> flower

Some more but the previous bur was already voted on.

  • Qingxin_flower, elpis_flower and fire flower are fictional
  • Spoken_heart implies heart so spoken flower should imply flower.
  • Umbrella flower is a simmilar case, it's for decorations, hat flower implicates flower and hat.
  • Gentiana_(flower) has empty wiki but is a flower.
  • Decorations usually imply the decoration.
  • So do on/in tags.

any particular issue with implying these to "flower" compared to the more color based burs above or did it just run out of time?

1 2