Should a tag I had a hand in creating be changed.

A few years back I made this comment. I hadn't thought long and hard about it, even though it's what I called it in my libraries back then. I wasn't expecting someone to actually run with it. I've since moved to calling it a "Lockjob" like "handjob", "blowjob", "thighjob", etc, because the recipient is locked in place by the benefactor's arms. Important to note that "blowjob" and "thighjob" are aliases for more succinct naming ("fellatio" and "thigh_sex"). So while "hugging_fellatio" is more sensible, I don't think it captures all of them. I made the change in my libraries because, while something like this can certainly be a type of "hug", I didn't think the original and others are really "hugs." I think "lockjob" is an easier to handle tag name, but that doesn't obviously mean its better, or even good at all. So I ask;

*Should I recommend a change?
*Should I recommend an alias?

Demios said:

A few years back I made this comment. I hadn't thought long and hard about it, even though it's what I called it in my libraries back then. I wasn't expecting someone to actually run with it. I've since moved to calling it a "Lockjob" like "handjob", "blowjob", "thighjob", etc, because the recipient is locked in place by the benefactor's arms. Important to note that "blowjob" and "thighjob" are aliases for more succinct naming ("fellatio" and "thigh_sex"). So while "hugging_fellatio" is more sensible, I don't think it captures all of them. I made the change in my libraries because, while something like this can certainly be a type of "hug", I didn't think the original and others are really "hugs." I think "lockjob" is an easier to handle tag name, but that doesn't obviously mean its better, or even good at all. So I ask;

*Should I recommend a change?
*Should I recommend an alias?

Of course I meant to put this in tags, not general...

Demios said:

Of course I meant to put this in tags, not general...

While you're in this thread, look at the top bar. To the right of Reply there should be written "Edit", which will allow you to edit the thread itself.

BUR #28248 has been rejected.

create alias hug_and_suck -> lockjob

For a quick vote

I support the rename of the tag from hug_and_suck to lockjob.

But then it should be gardened according to some new rules, and posts like post #7511192 or post #6156814 should be removed

I think an intuitive tag name is far better than an obscure one made up on the spot. "Hug and suck" is simple and immediately tells you what it's for. Meanwhile "lockjob" could mean a million different things. The first thing I thought was of a hairjob done with a single hair lock, or shoving a padlock up someone's orifices.

nonamethanks said:

I think an intuitive tag name is far better than an obscure one made up on the spot. "Hug and suck" is simple and immediately tells you what it's for. Meanwhile "lockjob" could mean a million different things. The first thing I thought was of a hairjob done with a single hair lock, or shoving a padlock up someone's orifices.

I don't disagree there, it just felt to me like all "hug_and_suck" are "lockjobs", but not all "lockjobs" are "hug_and_suck."

BUR #28261 has been rejected.

create alias hug_and_suck -> hugging_fellatio

Well I don't think hug_and_suck is intuitive, or lockjob is obscure, or is made up on the spot. (Actually if we can believe OP, hug_and_suck is made up on the spot, while lockjob is the product of years of usage...) And I don't think that hug_and_suck is immediately telling what it's for, and lockjob isn't. Rather the exact opposite.

But here's the other suggested version.

https://hijiribe.donmai.us/post_versions?search[changed_tags]=hug_and_suck the usage doesn't seem intuitive to me, it has a ton of removals

I just gardened it a few days ago and I only found 5-10 mistags. I wouldn't call that a ton.

reg_panda said:

BUR #28248 has been rejected.

create alias hug_and_suck -> lockjob

For a quick vote

Based on the response to this poll, seems like people would prefer it as it is.

Demios said:

Based on the response to this poll, seems like people would prefer it as it is.

I do for sure, easier to search and to-the-point. Thanks for creating it by the way, helped me rediscover kaminari doon and it's a good utility alias for encompassing the entire action in just one tag. "Lockjob" sounds like it was chalked on the fly and doesn't really tell me much, easy to confuse it for something else.

i kinda suspect that nonamethanks derailed the vote, and people don't intuitively think that there is a hug on
post #4469704
post #672589
post #947026
also don't intuitively think that it is a noteworthy position, which is intuitively somehow the same as
post #3244964
post #6639573,
and they should have an own tag. I sure as hell don't.

Okay, I think i should leave. I have a strong opinion about this, but low stakes, i don't care about the tag, and i am fine if people that use it do whatever they want with it.

Disagreeing with you is not derailing the vote. Those 3 posts you linked look like mistags to me.

[deleted]

The bulk update request #28248 (forum #291464) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #28261 (forum #291520) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.