Scalar said:
It's a higher quality, so whats the problem?
If you don't make the higher quality one the parent, I'm not even gonna consider undeleting it.
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
Btw, are pics like post #526569 and post #543445 allowed? I sorta understand mods not approving stuff like post #527019 due to their content (even though they're very well drawn and not against the rules) but these two look like ToS violations, and one of them seems to have been through the queue too.
Thanks for your time.
That depends really on how you interpret "guro". Personally I don't think they're gruesome, and as such don't qualify. We're all adult people (or are supposed to be), and are expected to be handle a bit of content like that. Guro, IMHO, happens when it's evisceration for the sole purpose of evisceration.
葉月 said:
That depends really on how you interpret "guro". Personally I don't think they're gruesome, and as such don't qualify. We're all adult people (or are supposed to be), and are expected to be handle a bit of content like that. Guro, IMHO, happens when it's evisceration for the sole purpose of evisceration.
I actually like them, I just thought it was curious (post #526569 is way more extreme to me than post #527019, and since they're both very well-made, I kinda wondered why one was approved while the other wasn't)
So, is the line drawn at something like this then?
I think you're overthinking it. At a certain level, it's impossible to explain why you like something and don't like something else. However, post #527019 is simply futa porn, and visibly over-the-top at it. I like jeffr's drawing style, but I'm not a fan of his futa. Not to mention that it's not /g/ material at all, but /f/. And not everyone has to like each and every freakish post there.
As for the pic you linked, yeah, that's about it. I personally find it fairly mild, but it's definitely something I'd think twice before approving, if at all.
sakuma said:
please
post #545481
post #545475
post #545471
and this
post #539532
I'm not a big fan of that recent touhou/ff crossover fad. As one comment said, it's a silly venue for people who really need their tohos to be heterosexual.
Some nice (positively scored, and faved) Godzilla pictures:
post #545437
post #545440
post #545442
post #545444
post #545445
post #545446
post #545452
post #545453
post #544849
post #544844
post #544829
post #544823
post #544821
葉月 said:
If you don't make the higher quality one the parent, I'm not even gonna consider undeleting it.
I already did.
I'm not so interested in coupling, too.
I even can say that I hate reimu x buront pictures.
(by the way, many artists on pixiv remove "touhou" tag but put "Iron of Ying-Yang" tag, for people don't like crossover, ff, buront or other 2ch things.)
But original story on nico is so good (can say manly like TTGL(...not good example,but)) that I decided to support it.
(some pictures on danbooru are tagged "Iron of Ying-Yang" on pixiv,for example post #459267)
Any kinds of fans idiocy have no difference I think.(Yuri or crossover)
I only want to enjoy short but hot feast with many.
If only I could speak english as fluently as japanese.
Anyway thanks for some approval.
Updated
post #545043
post #545046
Two more of asamura_hio's pages from pool #822.
sakuma said:
(can say manly like TTGL(...not good example,but))
I personally feel TTGL guys are too lean/scrawny to fit the MAN that rightly exemplifies manly. If it's any less than Cho-Aniki-level, it is merely a man.
Relatedly, appealing post #541269 & post #418493 (though the latter isn't anime/manga sourced nor styled)
Came across this: post #531876
rehcaerp said:
post #523698
Dogenzaka said:
post #175406
Don't appeal zone flashes unless you give a proper reason why they should be reconsidered. One such reason is "it's not porn and has been deleted mistakenly", otherwise you don't need to bother.
