Posted under General
BUR #27256 has been rejected.
rename rainot -> rainot_(ai-artist)
rename zero_(qingsongzero) -> zero_(qingsongzero)_(ai-artist)
rename lilium_(lilydisease) -> lilium_(lilydisease)_(ai-artist)
Alternative as proposed. Just a small list for now to see what people think.
Excluding pokoooo_(fartsonist), because that would need a different qualifier. But that is a bridge for another time, let's tackle this one first.
Bad qualifier; no reason for it to be hyphenated.
Two of the artists also shouldn't receive the qualifier because they have works that are ostensibly not AI-generated: rainot has 7 non-AI works, zero (qingsongzero) has 3. This isn't the case for lilium (lilydisease).
So you'd only want to do "rename lilium_(lilydisease) -> lilium_(lilydisease)_(ai_artist)".
Updated
This is a bad hack for something that should be solved by adding functionality to the site.
A much better solution would be a "warning" flag on artist entries. To set the flag would require a wiki entry for the artist be created that explains in as few words as possible what the uploader should be aware of, like "uses AI", "repost account", "commissioner, see commentary for artist", etc.
This short wiki could be displayed on the upload page itself, or be shown on clicking an universal warning label shown on the upload page.
The bulk update request #26806 (forum #282967) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #27256 (forum #284574) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Sober_Bober said:
+1 for Marking them with implications, and I think it is currently the best route we can go for in this case, considering the pros we get can outweigh the cons nnt mentioned.
We could put a quick warning note on artist creation page to only create a new artist if you have a post you want to up.
