imply yaoi_(object) -> pornography

CoreMack said:

The point of what me and feline lump said is not that it shouldn't be tagged as yuri_(object), as it clearly is that and should be tagged with it. The point is that it's a counterexample to the BUR. It's obviously yuri_(object) and also obviously not pornography.

Yuri_(object) is the yuri equivalent of yaoi_(object). Yaoi_(object) currently implies pornography. Therefore, yuri_(object) should also imply pornography. If you don't think that should be the case, then you should submit a BUR to remove the existing yaoi_(object) implication.

BUR #27135 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication yaoi_(object) -> pornography

As the posts Coremack linked earlier evidence, it is perfectly possible for in-universe depictions of yaoi/yuri to be non-pornographic in nature. This implication should have never been a thing.

I'll concede that stuff under artist self-reference/meta announcements is too much of a stretch to include in that tag. I guess it still counts as yaoi (object)/yuri (object) though.

The bulk update request #27135 (forum #284022) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #27082 (forum #283866) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.