Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
unicogirl said:
Color concept post #534231
Official design post #534230
Remember to tag sketches as such. But, who exactly is she, and what does official_art mean on something that looks like an original, fan-made character? I'd like those things to be mentioned in the wiki, since they're not at all obvious.
I would like to appeal these posts
Also, I am not sure if I appealed this already, but I don't remember doing so:
ty
post #536915
The rest of the pool has been approved, and these comics are generally pretty funny.
Can I request post #535154 and all of the other ones that belongs to the same pool? Since the first two pages have been recovered, I thought the others would have come later, but no. Please recover them, since they're already translated.
KitKatBar said:
post #513040
No. It was specifically deleted for the reason given, it's not coming back. Speaking of which, don't we consider scat to be a ToS violation? If not, why not?
post #537795
post #537794
post #537801
post #537797
post #537793
I honestly don't see what was quite wrong with them.
Edit: Gotcha, gotcha. I'll try to avoid game CG from now on (unless it's really good). Shame I didn't even know it was game CG in the first place =\
Updated
葉月 said:
No. It was specifically deleted for the reason given, it's not coming back. Speaking of which, don't we consider scat to be a ToS violation? If not, why not?
We do, generally. (I can think of one or two borderline examples)
It has less tolerance than Guro, you have to have a pretty compelling case to not have a scat image deleted, as far as I am concerned.
Dogenzaka said:
post #513566
post #368960
Never in a million years.
Bapabooiee said:
post #537795
post #537794
post #537801
post #537797
post #537793I honestly don't see what was quite wrong with them.
Game CGs. Bad, bland, mass-produced CGs. The less we have of those, the better.
Fencedude said:
Never in a million years.
Speaking of which, would anyone object strongly if I went and killed all of zone's flashes? Because, IMHO, every single one of them is "never in a million years". They're bad, bad, bad, with not a single redeeming quality. And I want them dead.
葉月 said:
Speaking of which, would anyone object strongly if I went and killed all of zone's flashes? Because, IMHO, every single one of them is "never in a million years". They're bad, bad, bad, with not a single redeeming quality. And I want them dead.
I agree with you generally, but post #435843 has over 100 favorites. There must be something to it. :/
Also, appealing post #518855
xctman said:
I agree with you generally, but post #435843 has over 100 favorites. There must be something to it. :/
People on the internet are stupid and devoid of taste. It used to surprise me, then I got over it. We used to care about favourites a lot more, but that was before we instituted officially ignoring favourites for the purpose of deletion (in the form of mod queue), and even more importantly, when the user count was closer to 170 than to the 170k we have now. There are idiots who will fap to a dead raccoon as long as it has boobs on display, so 100 favs on a porn flash means nothing.
EDIT: moving the discussion to forum #28134 to avoid cluttering this thread more. Please continue there.
Updated
